Back to Search
Start Over
Enhanced dispatch and rendezvous doubles the catchment area and number of patients treated on a mobile stroke unit.
- Source :
-
Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association [J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis] 2020 Aug; Vol. 29 (8), pp. 104894. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 May 19. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Introduction: Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) deliver acute stroke treatment on-scene in coordination with Emergency Medical Services (EMS). One criticism of the MSU approach is the limited range of a single MSU. The Houston MSU is evaluating MSU implementation, and we developed a rendezvous approach as an innovative solution to expand the range and number of patients treated.<br />Methods: In addition to direct 911 dispatch of our MSU to the scene within our 7-mile catchment area, we empowered more distant EMS units to activate the MSU. We also monitored EMS radio communications to identify possible patients. For these distant patients, the MSU met the EMS unit en route to the stroke center and treated the patient at that intermediate location. The distribution of the distance from MSU base station to site of stroke and time from 911 alert to tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) bolus were compared between patients treated on-scene and by rendezvous using Wilcoxon rank sum test.<br />Results: Over 4 years, 338 acute ischemic stroke patients were treated with tPA on our MSU. Of these, 169 (50%) were treated on-scene after MSU dispatch at a median of 6.4 miles (IQR 6.4 miles) from MSU base station. 169 (50%) were treated by 'rendezvous' pathway with assessment and treatment of stroke a median of 12.4 miles from base (IQR 5.5 miles) (p< 0.0001). Time (min) from MSU alert to tPA bolus did not differ: 36.0 ± 10.0 for on-scene vs 37.0 ± 10.0 with rendezvous (p=0.65). 13% of patients alerted via direct 911 dispatch were treated vs 44% of rendezvous patients.<br />Conclusion: Adding a rendezvous approach to an MSU dispatch pathway doubles the range of operations and the number of patients treated by an MSU in an urban area, without incurring delay.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr Grotta and Ms Parker receiving consulting fees from Frazer Ltd, a manufacturer or Mobile Stroke Units. Dr Grotta receives research support from the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Genentech, and CSL Behring<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Comparative Effectiveness Research
Female
Health Services Needs and Demand
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Stroke diagnosis
Stroke physiopathology
Texas
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Urban Health Services
Catchment Area, Health
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
Emergency Medical Dispatch
Fibrinolytic Agents administration & dosage
Mobile Health Units
Stroke drug therapy
Thrombolytic Therapy
Time-to-Treatment
Tissue Plasminogen Activator administration & dosage
Transportation of Patients
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1532-8511
- Volume :
- 29
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32689599
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104894