Back to Search
Start Over
The Efficacy of Breast Implant Irrigant Solutions: A Comparative Analysis Using an In Vitro Model.
- Source :
-
Plastic and reconstructive surgery [Plast Reconstr Surg] 2020 Aug; Vol. 146 (2), pp. 301-308. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background: Infections are challenging complications of implant-based breast reconstruction and augmentation. They pose a clinical challenge, with significant economic implications. One proposed solution is implant irrigation at the time of placement. There is no consensus on the optimal irrigant solution.<br />Methods: The authors tested the relative efficacy of 10% povidone-iodine, Clorpactin, Prontosan, triple-antibiotic solution, or normal saline (negative control) against two strains each of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Sterile, smooth silicone implant disks were immersed in irrigant solution, then incubated in suspensions of methicillin-resistant S. aureus or S. epidermidis overnight. The disks were rinsed and sonicated to displace adherent bacteria from the implant surface, and the displaced bacteria were quantified. Normalized values were calculated to characterize the relative efficacy of each irrigant.<br />Results: Povidone-iodine resulted in reductions of the bacterial load by a factor of 10 to 10 for all strains. Prontosan-treated smooth breast implant disks had a 10-fold reduction in bacterial counts for all but one methicillin-resistant S. aureus strain. In comparison to Prontosan, triple-antibiotic solution demonstrated a trend of greater reduction in methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacterial load and weaker activity against S. epidermidis strains. Clorpactin reduced the recovered colony-forming units for only a single strain of S. epidermidis. Povidone-iodine demonstrated the greatest efficacy against all four strains. However, Clorpactin, triple-antibiotic solution, and Prontosan demonstrated similar efficacies.<br />Conclusions: Povidone-iodine was the most efficacious of the irrigants at reducing methicillin-resistant S. aureus and S. epidermidis contamination. Given the recent lifting of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration moratorium, larger clinical studies of povidone-iodine as a breast implant irrigant solution are warranted.<br />Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, V.
- Subjects :
- Bacitracin administration & dosage
Benzenesulfonates administration & dosage
Breast Implantation instrumentation
Cefazolin administration & dosage
Drug Combinations
Gentamicins administration & dosage
Humans
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus drug effects
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolation & purification
Povidone-Iodine administration & dosage
Prosthesis-Related Infections microbiology
Solutions
Staphylococcus epidermidis drug effects
Staphylococcus epidermidis isolation & purification
Therapeutic Irrigation methods
Anti-Infective Agents, Local administration & dosage
Biofilms drug effects
Breast Implantation adverse effects
Breast Implants microbiology
Prosthesis-Related Infections prevention & control
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1529-4242
- Volume :
- 146
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32740580
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007028