Back to Search
Start Over
Improving diagnostic performance of differentiating ocular adnexal lymphoma and idiopathic orbital inflammation using intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI.
- Source :
-
European journal of radiology [Eur J Radiol] 2020 Sep; Vol. 130, pp. 109191. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jul 25. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Purpose: To investigate the utility of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI (IVIM-DWI) derived diffusion and perfusion parameters in differentiating ocular adnexal lymphoma (OAL) from idiopathic orbital inflammation (IOI), and to assess whether IVIM-DWI provides improved diagnostic performance for the distinction.<br />Method: Twenty-one patients with OAL and 24 patients with IOI underwent IVIM-DWI. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and IVIM-DWI parameters including true diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) were measured in lesions by two independent radiologists. The MRI parameter differences between OAL and IOI were tested using two-sample t-test. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis curves were used to determine the diagnostic performance of significant parameters for differentiation between OAL and IOI.<br />Results: The ADC, D, and f were lower in OAL than those in IOI (ADC = 0.78 ± 0.12 vs. 0.99 ± 0.16 × 10 <superscript>-3</superscript> mm <superscript>2</superscript> /s, P < 0.001; D = 0.34 ± 0.15 vs. 0.76 ± 0.25 × 10 <superscript>-3</superscript> mm <superscript>2</superscript> /s, P < 0.001; f = 0.31 ± 0.06 vs. 0.41 ± 0.08 × 100 %, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in D* between OAL and IOI (P = 0.235). The optimal cut-off values of ADC, D, and f in differentiating OAL from IOI were 0.83 × 10 <superscript>-3</superscript> mm <superscript>2</superscript> /s, 0.56 × 10 <superscript>-3</superscript> mm <superscript>2</superscript> /s, and 0.36 × 100 %, respectively. No significant differences were found in areas under the curve (AUCs) among ADC, D and f (all P > 0.05). The combination of D and f provided significantly higher AUC than ADC (AUC = 0.984 vs. 0.838, Z = 2.128, P = 0.033), and had higher sensitivity of 95.24 %, specificity of 95.83 %, and accuracy of 95.56 %.<br />Conclusions: IVIM-DWI is valuable in differentiating OAL from IOI, and D combined f can improve the performance of differential diagnosis.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Humans
Inflammation
Male
Middle Aged
ROC Curve
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods
Eye Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Lymphoma diagnostic imaging
Neoplasms, Adnexal and Skin Appendage diagnostic imaging
Orbital Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Orbital Pseudotumor diagnostic imaging
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1872-7727
- Volume :
- 130
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- European journal of radiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32745898
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109191