Discrimination of major and minor streptococci incriminated in bovine mastitis by MALDI-TOF MS fingerprinting and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

The current work investigated the discriminatory potential of MALDI-TOF MS fingerprinting towards most-relevant major (Streptococcus agalactiae, S. dysgalactiae, S. uberis) and minor (S. canis, S. parauberis, S. salivarius, S. equinus and S. gallolyticus) streptococci involved in bovine mastitis (BM), in comparison to 16S rRNA gene sequencing (GS)-based identification. The MALDI-TOF MS-generated spectral fingerprints were recruited for eliciting a detailed proteomic map that demonstrated clear variability for inter- and intra-species-specific biomarkers. Besides, a phyloproteomic dendrogram was evolved and comparatively analyzed against the phylogenetic one obtained from 16S rRNA GS in order to assess the differentiation of streptococci of bovine origin based on variability of protein fingerprints versus the variation of 16S rRNA gene homology. Results showed that the discrimination of BM-implicated streptococci can be obtained by both approaches; however MALDI-TOF MS was superior, achieving more variability at both intra- and sub-species levels. MALDI-TOF MS spectral analytics revealed that Streptococcus spp. exhibited three genus-specific biomarkers (peaks with m/z values at 2112, 4452 and 5955) and all streptococci exhibited spectral variability at both species and subspecies levels. Remarkably, MALDI-TOF MS fingerprinting was found to be at least as robust as 16S rRNA GS-based identification, allowing much cheaper and faster analysis, and additionally exhibiting high reliability for characterization of BM-implicated streptococci, thus proving to be a powerful tool that can be used independently within dairy diagnostics.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests. None of the authors of this paper has a financial or personal relationship with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.
(Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)