Back to Search Start Over

Pollutants and nutrition: Are methylmercury effects on blood pressure and lipoprotein profile comparable to high-fat diet in mice?

Authors :
Lacerda Leocádio PC
Dias RP
Pinto DV
Reis JM
Rodrigues Nascimento JC
Anne de Castro Brito G
Valença JT Jr
Foureaux G
Ferreira AJ
Windmöller CC
Crespo-Lopez ME
Santos FA
Oriá RB
Alvarez-Leite JI
Source :
Ecotoxicology and environmental safety [Ecotoxicol Environ Saf] 2020 Nov; Vol. 204, pp. 111036. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 09.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Human exposure to methylmercury (MeHg) due to contaminated fish intake as part of a high-fat (HFD), high-carbohydrate diets is a reality today for many populations. HFD is associated with hypertension and hyperlipidemia, primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Some studies suggest that MeHg induces those risk factors. We evaluated the effect of MeHg exposure in mice fed with HFD or control diet for eight weeks. In the last experimental 15 days, the half group received a MeHg solution (20 mg/L) replacing water. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate, lipoprotein concentrations, and paraoxonase activity were evaluated. Liver cholesterol, triacylglycerol, and IBA-1+ cells, as well as transcriptional levels of genes related to lipid metabolism and inflammatory response, were also assessed. HFD and both MeHg groups presented increased BP and total cholesterol (TC). In the liver, HFD but not MeHg was related to an increase in TC. Also, MeHg intoxication reduced paraoxonase activity regardless of diet. MeHg intoxication and HFD increased steatosis and the number of IBA-1+ cells and modified some gene transcripts associated with lipid metabolism. In conclusion, we demonstrated that MeHg effects on CVD risk factors resemble those caused by HFD.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1090-2414
Volume :
204
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Ecotoxicology and environmental safety
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32784013
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111036