Back to Search
Start Over
Meta-analysis dataset comparing orthodontic mini-implants and conventional anchorage reinforcement for maximum orthodontic anchorage.
- Source :
-
Data in brief [Data Brief] 2020 Jul 11; Vol. 32, pp. 106010. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jul 11 (Print Publication: 2020). - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- The present article describes data from systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the efficacy and safety outcomes comparing mini-implants (MIs) and conventional anchorage reinforcement in patients with maximum dentoalveolar protrusion. All relevant RCTs and non-RCTs published up to 2018 were collected from PubMed, Embase and Cochrane database. Thirteen studies assessing the effect of mini-implants were included, of which 4 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 9 observational studies. The efficacy parameters include mesiodistal movements of molars and incisors and vertical movements of molars and incisors. Whereas, the safety parameters were angular and linear measurement of soft tissue change. Subgroup analysis data was provided in terms of patients average age (<18 years and ≥18 years) at the initiation of treatment. This dataset is suitable for research purpose in the field of orthodontics and also helps dental doctors to determine their treatment preferences in the choice of anchorage reinforcement.<br />Competing Interests: None.<br /> (© 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2352-3409
- Volume :
- 32
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Data in brief
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32793770
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106010