Back to Search Start Over

Palliative care delivery according to age in 12,000 women with metastatic breast cancer: Analysis in the multicentre ESME-MBC cohort 2008-2016.

Authors :
Frasca M
Sabathe C
Delaloge S
Galvin A
Patsouris A
Levy C
Mouret-Reynier MA
Desmoulins I
Vanlemmens L
Bachelot T
Goncalves A
Perotin V
Uwer L
Frenel JS
Ferrero JM
Bouleuc C
Eymard JC
Dieras V
Leheurteur M
Petit T
Dalenc F
Jaffre A
Chevrot M
Courtinard C
Mathoulin-Pelissier S
Source :
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) [Eur J Cancer] 2020 Sep; Vol. 137, pp. 240-249. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 14.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) often require inpatient palliative care (IPC). However, mounting evidence suggests age-related disparities in palliative care delivery. This study aimed to assess the cumulative incidence function (CIF) of IPC delivery, as well as the influence of age.<br />Methods: The national ESME (Epidemio-Strategy-Medical-Economical)-MBC cohort includes consecutive MBC patients treated in 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centres. ICD-10 palliative care coding was used for IPC identification.<br />Results: Our analysis included 12,375 patients, 5093 (41.2%) of whom were aged 65 or over. The median follow-up was 41.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.5-42.5). The CIF of IPC was 10.3% (95% CI, 10.2-10.4) and 24.8% (95% CI, 24.7-24.8) at 2 and 8 years, respectively. At 2 years, among triple-negative patients, young patients (<65 yo) had a higher CIF of IPC than older patients after adjusting for cancer characteristics, centre and period (65+/<65: β = -0.05; 95% CI, -0.08 to -0.01). Among other tumour sub-types, older patients received short-term IPC more frequently than young patients (65+/<65: β = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.03). At 8 years, outside large centres, IPC was delivered less frequently to older patients adjusted to cancer characteristics and period (65+/<65: β = -0.03; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.01).<br />Conclusion: We found a relatively low CIF of IPC and that age influenced IPC delivery. Young triple-negative and older non-triple-negative patients needed more short-term IPCs. Older patients diagnosed outside large centres received less long-term IPC. These findings highlight the need for a wider implementation of IPC facilities and for more age-specific interventions.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-0852
Volume :
137
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32805641
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2020.07.007