Back to Search Start Over

Meniscal Repair in the Setting of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results From the MARS Cohort.

Authors :
Wright RW
Huston LJ
Haas AK
Nwosu SK
Allen CR
Anderson AF
Cooper DE
DeBerardino TM
Dunn WR
Lantz BBA
Mann B
Spindler KP
Stuart MJ
Pennings JS
Albright JP
Amendola AN
Andrish JT
Annunziata CC
Arciero RA
Bach BR Jr
Baker CL 3rd
Bartolozzi AR
Baumgarten KM
Bechler JR
Berg JH
Bernas GA
Brockmeier SF
Brophy RH
Bush-Joseph CA
Butler V JB
Campbell JD
Carey JL
Carpenter JE
Cole BJ
Cooper JM
Cox CL
Creighton RA
Dahm DL
David TS
Flanigan DC
Frederick RW
Ganley TJ
Garofoli EA
Gatt CJ Jr
Gecha SR
Giffin JR
Hame SL
Hannafin JA
Harner CD
Harris NL Jr
Hechtman KS
Hershman EB
Hoellrich RG
Hosea TM
Johnson DC
Johnson TS
Jones MH
Kaeding CC
Kamath GV
Klootwyk TE
Levy BA
Ma CB
Maiers GP 2nd
Marx RG
Matava MJ
Mathien GM
McAllister DR
McCarty EC
McCormack RG
Miller BS
Nissen CW
O'Neill DF
Owens BD
Parker RD
Purnell ML
Ramappa AJ
Rauh MA
Rettig AC
Sekiya JK
Shea KG
Sherman OH
Slauterbeck JR
Smith MV
Spang JT
Steven J Svoboda L
Taft TN
Tenuta JJ
Tingstad EM
Vidal AF
Viskontas DG
White RA
Williams JS Jr
Wolcott ML
Wolf BR
York JJ
Source :
The American journal of sports medicine [Am J Sports Med] 2020 Oct; Vol. 48 (12), pp. 2978-2985. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 21.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: Meniscal preservation has been demonstrated to contribute to long-term knee health. This has been a successful intervention in patients with isolated tears and tears associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, the results of meniscal repair in the setting of revision ACL reconstruction have not been documented.<br />Purpose: To examine the prevalence and 2-year operative success rate of meniscal repairs in the revision ACL setting.<br />Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.<br />Methods: All cases of revision ACL reconstruction with concomitant meniscal repair from a multicenter group between 2006 and 2011 were selected. Two-year follow-up was obtained by phone and email to determine whether any subsequent surgery had occurred to either knee since the initial revision ACL reconstruction. If so, operative reports were obtained, whenever possible, to verify the pathologic condition and subsequent treatment.<br />Results: In total, 218 patients (18%) from 1205 revision ACL reconstructions underwent concurrent meniscal repairs. There were 235 repairs performed: 153 medial, 48 lateral, and 17 medial and lateral. The majority of these repairs (n = 178; 76%) were performed with all-inside techniques. Two-year surgical follow-up was obtained on 90% (197/218) of the cohort. Overall, the meniscal repair failure rate was 8.6% (17/197) at 2 years. Of the 17 failures, 15 were medial (13 all-inside, 2 inside-out) and 2 were lateral (both all-inside). Four medial failures were treated in conjunction with a subsequent repeat revision ACL reconstruction.<br />Conclusion: Meniscal repair in the revision ACL reconstruction setting does not have a high failure rate at 2-year follow-up. Failure rates for medial and lateral repairs were both <10% and consistent with success rates of primary ACL reconstruction meniscal repair. Medial tears underwent reoperation for failure at a significantly higher rate than lateral tears.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1552-3365
Volume :
48
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The American journal of sports medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32822238
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546520948850