Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of plasma etonogestrel concentrations sampled from the contralateral-to-implant and ipsilateral-to-implant arms of contraceptive implant users.
- Source :
-
Contraception [Contraception] 2020 Dec; Vol. 102 (6), pp. 403-405. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 26. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Objective: To compare plasma etonogestrel concentrations sampled from the contralateral- versus ipsilateral-to-implant arm.<br />Study Design: Sub-analysis of a cross-sectional study in Botswana in 33 participants who provided contralateral and ipsilateral blood samples.<br />Results: Plasma etonogestrel concentrations in contralateral and ipsilateral specimens were highly correlated (correlation coefficient = 0.99; p < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis of agreement showed that etonogestrel levels were on average 5.9 pg/mL higher (2.1%) in ipsilateral compared to contralateral specimens (95% confidence interval: -4.1, 15.9 pg/mL).<br />Conclusions: We found no meaningful differences in plasma etonogestrel concentrations between samples taken from the contralateral- versus ipsilateral-to-implant arm.<br />Implications: Our data suggest that etonogestrel plasma concentrations are unlikely to be meaningfully different between samples drawn from the ipsilateral- versus the contralateral-to-implant arms in etonogestrel contraceptive implant users.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Arm
Botswana
Contraceptive Agents, Female administration & dosage
Contraceptive Agents, Female pharmacokinetics
Cross-Sectional Studies
Desogestrel administration & dosage
Desogestrel pharmacokinetics
Drug Implants pharmacokinetics
Female
Humans
Contraceptive Agents, Female blood
Desogestrel blood
Drug Implants administration & dosage
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1879-0518
- Volume :
- 102
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Contraception
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32858051
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.08.011