Back to Search Start Over

Landscape of phase 1 clinical trials for minors with cancer in the United States.

Authors :
Nader JH
Neel DV
Shulman DS
Ma C
Bourgeois F
DuBois SG
Source :
Pediatric blood & cancer [Pediatr Blood Cancer] 2020 Nov; Vol. 67 (11), pp. e28694. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 04.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Objectives: Understanding trends in characteristics of early phase trials that allow minors with cancer to participate may inform additional efforts to improve cancer drug development for young people.<br />Methods: We accessed data for oncology phase 1 or phase 1/2 trials in the United States from ClinicalTrials.gov with lower age bound for eligibility <18 years. Descriptive statistics were calculated and trends over time evaluated using logistic and multinomial logistic regression.<br />Results: Six hundred twelve trials met inclusion criteria. Sixty-five percent of trials were for older adults that also allowed minors, while 9% were exclusively for patients ≤18 years of age. Eighty-three percent of trials included at least one novel agent, while 17% studied only conventional therapies. Fifty-eight percent of trials studied treatments not yet Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved (48% if exclusively for patients ≤18 years). Fifteen percent of trials for which dose-escalation method could be determined, utilized a model-based design. Eighteen percent of all trials were industry sponsored (48% if exclusively for patients ≤18 years). Forty-nine percent of all trials were multicenter (69% if exclusively for patients ≤18 years). There was an increase in trials exclusively focused on patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumors over the study period (P ≤ .02). No other temporal trends were seen. The median times from first-in-adult to first-in-pediatric for monotherapy and combination trials were 5.7 and 3.3 years, respectively.<br />Conclusion: The paucity of clear temporal trends highlights the need for innovation in early drug development for young people. Our analysis serves as a benchmark against which to evaluate initiatives to improve pediatric cancer drug development.<br /> (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1545-5017
Volume :
67
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Pediatric blood & cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32886429
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.28694