Back to Search Start Over

Survival outcomes of single-port access laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors :
Eoh KJ
Li LY
Shin W
Lee JY
Nam EJ
Kim S
Kim YT
Kim SW
Source :
Surgical oncology [Surg Oncol] 2020 Sep; Vol. 34, pp. 140-145. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Apr 17.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: Emerging data from the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial (NCT00614211) suggested that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for cervical cancer is correlated with worse survival outcomes than open surgery. This finding could be attributed to the different learning curves for laparoscopic surgery among surgeons. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and survival outcomes of single-port access (SPA) laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) for treating early cervical cancer.<br />Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent SPA LRH between 2009 and 2018 performed by a single surgeon with expertise in SPA laparoscopy using conventional instrumentation and a homemade glove port system.<br />Results: Type C (93.2%) and B (6.8%) radical hysterectomy were performed in 59 women with cervical cancer classified as IA (3.4%), IB (94.9%), and IIA (1.7%). Forty-one patients (69.5%) had squamous cell carcinoma and 32 patients (52.5%) had tumors < 2 cm. The median operative time was 235 (125-382) minutes. There were no perioperative complications or cases of conversion to open surgery. Postoperative complications, including chylous ascites, low hemoglobin, lymphedema, and vault dehiscence, were observed in 5 patients (8.5%). Median follow-up time was 3.1 (0.6-8.6) years and 3 patients experienced recurrence (1 local and 2 distant failures). Five-year disease-free survival was 94.9% (56/59) and the 5-year overall survival rate was 98.3% (58/59).<br />Conclusions: SPA LRH is feasible and safe for patients with early-stage cervical cancer when performed by experienced surgeons without compromising the radicality and oncologic outcomes.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-3320
Volume :
34
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Surgical oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32891319
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2020.04.005