Back to Search
Start Over
Favipiravir versus other antiviral or standard of care for COVID-19 treatment: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Source :
-
Virology journal [Virol J] 2020 Sep 24; Vol. 17 (1), pp. 141. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 24. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background: The COVID-19 causing coronavirus is an enveloped RNA virus that utilizes an enzyme RNA dependent RNA polymerase for its replication. Favipiravir (FVP) triphosphate, a purine nucleoside analog, inhibits that enzyme. We have conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of the drug FVP as a treatment for COVID-19.<br />Methods: Databases like Pubmed, Pubmed Central, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, preprint sites, and clinicaltirals.gov were searched. The studies with the standard of care (SOC) and FVP as a treatment drug were considered as the treatment group and the SOC with other antivirals and supportive care as the control group. Quantitative synthesis was done using RevMan 5.4. Clinical improvement, negative conversion of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), adverse effects, and oxygen requirements were studied.<br />Results: We identified a total of 1798 studies after searching the electronic databases. Nine in the qualitative studies and four studies in the quantitative synthesis met the criteria. There was a significant clinical improvement in the FVP group on the 14th day compared to the control group (RR 1.29, 1.08-1.54). Clinical deterioration rates were less likely in the FVP group though statistically not significant (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.30-1.14) at the endpoint of study (7-15 days). The meta-analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups on viral clearance (day 14: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.84-1.33), non-invasive ventilation or oxygen requirement (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.42-1.39), and adverse effects (OR 0.69, 0.13-3.57). There are 31 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) registered in different parts of the world focusing FVP for COVID-19 treatment.<br />Conclusion: There is a significant clinical and radiological improvement following treatment with FVP in comparison to the standard of care with no significant differences on viral clearance, oxygen support requirement and side effect profiles.
- Subjects :
- Amides adverse effects
Antiviral Agents adverse effects
Betacoronavirus enzymology
COVID-19
Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
Coronavirus Infections virology
DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases antagonists & inhibitors
Databases, Factual
Enzyme Inhibitors therapeutic use
Humans
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral virology
Pyrazines adverse effects
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
SARS-CoV-2
Standard of Care
Treatment Outcome
COVID-19 Drug Treatment
Amides therapeutic use
Antiviral Agents therapeutic use
Betacoronavirus drug effects
Coronavirus Infections drug therapy
Pneumonia, Viral drug therapy
Pyrazines therapeutic use
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1743-422X
- Volume :
- 17
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Virology journal
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32972430
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-020-01412-z