Back to Search Start Over

Adverse Events and Modes of Failure Related to Rotational Atherectomy System: The Utility of the MAUDE Database.

Authors :
Khalid N
Javed H
Shlofmitz E
Chen Y
Dheendsa A
Musallam A
Khan JM
Wermers JP
Case BC
Forrestal BJ
Chezar-Azerrad C
Yerasi C
Rogers T
Hashim H
Ben-Dor I
Bernardo NL
Satler L
Waksman R
Source :
Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions [Cardiovasc Revasc Med] 2021 Jun; Vol. 27, pp. 57-62. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Aug 27.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background/purpose: Coronary artery calcification is a marker of advanced atherosclerosis and a predictor of adverse clinical outcomes. Rotational atherectomy (RA) can effectively modify calcified lesions, optimizing procedural outcomes. We interrogated the most commonly reported adverse events involving rotational atherectomy systems (Rotablator and Rotapro) by analyzing post-marketing surveillance data from the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.<br />Methods/materials: We queried MAUDE from September 1, 2016, through December 31, 2019. After excluding duplicate reports, we included 363 reports for Rotablator and 63 reports for Rotapro in the final analysis.<br />Results: Percentages represent the proportion of total submitted MAUDE reports. The most commonly reported complications for Rotablator and Rotapro included dissection (2.7% and 6.3%, respectively) and perforation (4.1% and 19%, respectively). The most commonly reported device-related issues included detachment or structural damage, or both, for Rotablator (39.1%) and entrapment of the device component for Rotapro (47.6%). The most commonly damaged device component was the Rotawire, whereas the most commonly entrapped device component was the Rotaburr for both device configurations. Rotablator and Rotapro device-related complications were most commonly reported for the left anterior descending artery.<br />Conclusion: An analysis of the MAUDE database demonstrates that in real-world practice, RA devices are associated with important complications. Ongoing surveillance of safety profiles, patient outcomes, and failure modes of RA devices is warranted. Our analysis provides important insights into the mechanisms of failure of RA devices and associated complications but cannot verify causality.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest RW –Advisory Board: Amgen, Boston Scientific, Cardioset, Cardiovascular Systems Inc., Medtronic, Philips, Pi-Cardia Ltd.; Consultant: Amgen, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardioset, Cardiovascular Systems Inc., Medtronic, Philips, Pi-Cardia Ltd.; Grant Support: AstraZeneca, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Chiesi; Speakers Bureau: AstraZeneca, Chiesi; Investor: MedAlliance. TR – Proctor and Consultant: Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences; Advisory Board: Medtronic; Equity interest: Transmural Systems. All other authors: None.<br /> (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1878-0938
Volume :
27
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33071196
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2020.08.038