Back to Search Start Over

External validation of a nomogram predicting risk of bleeding control interventions after high-grade renal trauma: The Multi-institutional Genito-Urinary Trauma Study.

Authors :
Keihani S
Wang SS
Joyce RP
Rogers DM
Gross JA
Nocera AP
Selph JP
Fang E
Hagedorn JC
Voelzke BB
Rezaee ME
Moses RA
Arya CS
Sensenig RL
Glavin K
Broghammer JA
Higgins MM
Gupta S
Castillejo Becerra CM
Baradaran N
Zhang C
Presson AP
Nirula R
Myers JB
Source :
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery [J Trauma Acute Care Surg] 2021 Feb 01; Vol. 90 (2), pp. 249-256.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Renal trauma grading has a limited ability to distinguish patients who will need intervention after high-grade renal trauma (HGRT). A nomogram incorporating both clinical and radiologic factors has been previously developed to predict bleeding control interventions after HGRT. We aimed to externally validate this nomogram using multicenter data from level 1 trauma centers.<br />Methods: We gathered data from seven level 1 trauma centers. Patients with available initial computed tomography (CT) scans were included. Each CT scan was reviewed by two radiologists blinded to the intervention data. Nomogram variables included trauma mechanism, hypotension/shock, concomitant injuries, vascular contrast extravasation (VCE), pararenal hematoma extension, and hematoma rim distance (HRD). Mixed-effect logistic regression was used to assess the associations between the predictors and bleeding intervention. The prediction accuracy of the nomogram was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and its 95% confidence interval (CI).<br />Results: Overall, 569 HGRT patients were included for external validation. Injury mechanism was blunt in 89%. Using initial CT scans, 14% had VCE and median HRD was 1.7 (0.9-2.6) cm. Overall, 12% underwent bleeding control interventions including 34 angioembolizations and 24 nephrectomies. In the multivariable analysis, presence of VCE was associated with a threefold increase in the odds of bleeding interventions (odds ratio, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.44-6.50). Every centimeter increase in HRD was associated with 66% increase in odds of bleeding interventions. External validation of the model provided excellent discrimination in predicting bleeding interventions with an area under the curve of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84-0.92).<br />Conclusion: Our results reinforce the importance of radiologic findings such as VCE and hematoma characteristics in predicting bleeding control interventions after renal trauma. The prediction accuracy of the proposed nomogram remains high using external data. These variables can help to better risk stratify high-grade renal injuries.<br />Level of Evidence: Prognostic and epidemiological study, level III.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2163-0763
Volume :
90
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33075030
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002987