Back to Search
Start Over
Tuberculous and Brucellar Spondylodiscitis: Comparative Analysis of Clinical, Laboratory, and Radiological Features.
- Source :
-
Asian spine journal [Asian Spine J] 2021 Dec; Vol. 15 (6), pp. 739-746. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Nov 18. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Study Design: This was a retrospective study.<br />Purpose: The aim was to compare the clinical, laboratory, radiological, and evolutionary features of tuberculous spondylodiscitis (TS) and brucellar spondylodiscitis (BS).<br />Overview of Literature: Clinical presentation of spondylodiscitis varies according to the underlying etiology, among which brucellosis and tuberculosis represent the primary cause, in endemic countries. Only a few studies have compared the characteristics between TS and BS.<br />Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using the data of all patients hospitalized for TS and BS in the infectious diseases department between 1991 and 2018.<br />Results: Among a total of 117 patients, 73 had TS (62.4%) and 44 had BS (37.6%). Females were significantly more affected with TS than males (56.2% vs. 22.7%, p<0.001). Fever (72.7% vs. 45.2%, p=0.004) and sweating (72.7% vs. 47.9%, p=0.009) were significantly more frequent among patients with BS. The median erythrocyte sedimentation rate was significantly higher in the TS group (median, 70 mm/hr; interquartile range [IQR], 45-103 mm/hr) than in the BS group (median, 50 mm/hr; IQR, 16-75 mm/hr) (p=0.003). Thoracic involvement was significantly more frequent in the TS group (53.4% vs. 34.1%, p=0.04), whereas lumbar involvement was significantly more frequent in the BS group (72.7% vs. 49.3%, p=0.01). Initial imaging findings revealed significantly higher frequencies of posterior vertebral arch involvement, vertebral compaction, and spinal cord compression in the TS group. Percutaneous abscess drainage (20.5% vs. 2.3%, p=0.005) and surgical treatment (17.8% vs. 2.3%, p=0.01) were more frequently indicated in the TS group, with a significant difference.<br />Conclusions: A combination of clinical, laboratory, and radiological features can be used to distinguish between TS and BS while these patients await diagnosis confirmation.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1976-1902
- Volume :
- 15
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Asian spine journal
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33198439
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0262