Back to Search Start Over

Perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic impact on cardio-oncology: results from the COVID-19 International Collaborative Network survey.

Authors :
Sadler D
DeCara JM
Herrmann J
Arnold A
Ghosh AK
Abdel-Qadir H
Yang EH
Szmit S
Akhter N
Leja M
Silva CMPDC
Raikhelkar J
Brown SA
Dent S
O'Quinn R
Thuny F
Moudgil R
Raez LE
Okwuosa T
Daniele A
Bauer B
Kondapalli L
Ismail-Khan R
Lax J
Blaes A
Nahleh Z
Elson L
Baldassarre LA
Zaha V
Rao V
Lara DS
Skurka K
Source :
Cardio-oncology (London, England) [Cardiooncology] 2020 Nov 27; Vol. 6 (1), pp. 28. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Nov 27.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: Re-allocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in delays in care delivery to patients with cardiovascular disease and cancer. The ability of health care providers to provide optimal care in this setting has not been formally evaluated.<br />Objectives: To assess the impact of COVID-19 resource re-allocation on scheduling, testing, elective procedures, telemedicine access, use of new COVID-19 therapies, and providers' opinions on healthcare policies among oncology and cardiology practitioners.<br />Methods: An electronic survey was conducted by a cardio-oncology collaborative network through regional and state chapters of the American College of Cardiology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the International Cardio-Oncology Society. Descriptive statistics were reported by frequency and proportion for analyses, and stratified categorically by geographic region and specialty.<br />Results: One thousand four hundred fifteen providers (43 countries) participated: 986 cardiologists, 306 oncologists, and 118 trainees/internal medicine. 63% (195/306) of oncologists vs 92% (896/976) of cardiologists reported cancellations of treatments/elective procedures (p = 0.01). 46% (442/970) of cardiologists and 25% (76/303) of oncologists modified the scope of their practice (p = < 0.001). Academic physicians (74.5%) felt better supplied with personal protective equipment (PPE) vs non-academic (74.5% vs 67.2%; p = 0.018). Telemedicine was less common in Europe 81% (74/91), and Latin America 64% (101/158), than the United States, 88% (950/1097) (p = < 0.001). 95% of all groups supported more active leadership from medical professional societies.<br />Conclusions: These results support initiatives to promote expanded coverage for telemedicine, increased access to PPE, better testing availability and involvement of medical professional societies to help with preparedness for future health care crisis.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2057-3804
Volume :
6
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cardio-oncology (London, England)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33292763
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-020-00085-5