Back to Search Start Over

Patients' characteristics and mortality in urgent/emergent/salvage transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insight from the OCEAN-TAVI registry.

Authors :
Enta Y
Miyasaka M
Taguri M
Tada N
Hata M
Watanabe Y
Naganuma T
Yamawaki M
Yamanaka F
Shirai S
Ueno H
Mizutani K
Tabata M
Takagi K
Yamamoto M
Hayashida K
Source :
Open heart [Open Heart] 2020 Dec; Vol. 7 (2).
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Objectives: Patients' backgrounds and clinical outcomes in urgent/emergent/salvage transcatheter aortic valve replacement (Em-TAVR) remain unclear. We investigated patient characteristics and the mortality in Em-TAVR and the predictors for the need for Em-TAVR.<br />Methods: We consecutively enrolled 1613 patients undergoing TAVR for severe aortic stenosis between October 2013 and July 2016 from the Optimised transCathEter vAlvular interventioN (OCEAN)-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) registry. The urgency was based on the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II. Urgent, emergent or salvage were included with the Em-TAVR group and elective with the El-TAVR group.<br />Results: Em-TAVR was observed in 87 (5.4%) patients. A higher Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), peripheral artery disease (PAD), hypoalbuminaemia, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and preoperative at least moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) predicted the need for the Em-TAVR by the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The Em-TAVR group had the higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score (13.7 (IQR 8.2-21.0) vs 6.5 (IQR 4.6-9.2); p<0.001) and higher 30-day mortality (9.2% vs 1.3%; p<0.001) than the El-TAVR group. Accordingly, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the cumulative mortality was higher in the Em-TAVR group than that in the El-TAVR group (log-rank; p<0.001). However, Em-TAVR did not predict mortality in the multivariate Cox regression analysis.<br />Conclusions: Em-TAVR was performed in 5.4% of patients. Higher CFS, PAD, hypoalbuminaemia, reduced LVEF and preprocedural MR predicted the need for Em-TAVR. Em-TAVR was not a predictor for mortality in the multivariate analysis, suggesting that it is a reasonable treatment option.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: NT, MY, TN, SS, KM, HU, YW, and MT are clinical proctors for Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic. KT and KH are clinical proctors of Edwards Lifesciences.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2053-3624
Volume :
7
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Open heart
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33318151
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2020-001467