Back to Search Start Over

Macrophage Markers Do Not Add to the Prediction of Liver Fibrosis by Transient Elastography in Patients With Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease.

Authors :
Kazankov K
Rosso C
Younes R
Armandi A
Hagström H
Møller HJ
Stål P
Bugianesi E
Grønbæk H
Source :
Frontiers in medicine [Front Med (Lausanne)] 2020 Dec 18; Vol. 7, pp. 616212. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Dec 18 (Print Publication: 2020).
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background and Aims: Non-invasive fibrosis staging is essential in metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). Transient elastography (TE) is a well-established method for liver fibrosis assessment. We have previously shown that the macrophage marker sCD163 is an independent predictor for fibrosis in MAFLD. In the present study we tested whether the combination of macrophage markers and TE improves fibrosis prediction. Methods: We measured macrophage markers soluble (s)CD163 and mannose receptor (sMR) in two independent cohorts from Italy ( n = 141) and Sweden ( n = 70) with biopsy-proven MAFLD and available TE. Results: In the Italian cohort, TE and sCD163 showed similar moderate associations with liver fibrosis (rho = 0.56, p < 0.001 and rho = 0.42, p < 0.001, respectively). TE had an area under the Receiver Operating Characteristics curve (AUROC, with 95% CI) for fibrosis; F ≥ 2 = 0.79 (0.72-0.86), F ≥ 3 = 0.81 (0.73-0.89), F4 = 0.95 (0.90-1.0). sCD163 also predicted fibrosis well [F ≥ 2 = 0.71 (0.63-0.80), F ≥ 3 = 0.82 (0.74-0.90), F4 = 0.89 (0.76-1.0)]. However, combining sCD163 and TE did not improve the AUROCs significantly [F ≥ 2 = 0.79 (0.72-0.86), F ≥ 3 = 0.85 (0.78-0.92), F4 = 0.97 (0.93-1.0)]. In the Swedish cohort, TE showed a closer association with fibrosis (rho = 0.73, p < 0.001) than sCD163 (rho = 0.43, p < 0.001) and sMR (rho = 0.46, p < 0.001). TE predicted fibrosis well [F ≥ 2 = 0.88 (0.80-0.97), F ≥ 3 = 0.90 (0.83-0.97), F4 = 0.87 (0.78-0.96)], whereas sCD163 did not (best AUROC 0.75). sMR showed a better prediction [F ≥ 2 = 0.68 (0.56-0.81), F ≥ 3 = 0.82 (0.71-0.92), F4 = 0.79 (0.66-0.93)], but the addition of sMR did not further improve the prediction of fibrosis by TE. Conclusion: In these cohorts of MAFLD patients, TE was superior to macrophage markers for fibrosis prediction and in contrast to our hypothesis the addition of these markers to TE did not improve its predictive capability.<br />Competing Interests: RY was employed by the company Boehringer Ingelheim International, Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung, Ingelheim, Germany. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Kazankov, Rosso, Younes, Armandi, Hagström, Møller, Stål, Bugianesi and Grønbæk.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2296-858X
Volume :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Frontiers in medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33392234
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.616212