Back to Search Start Over

Myocardial Fibrosis as a Predictor of Sudden Death in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors :
Zegard A
Okafor O
de Bono J
Kalla M
Lencioni M
Marshall H
Hudsmith L
Qiu T
Steeds R
Stegemann B
Leyva F
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology [J Am Coll Cardiol] 2021 Jan 05; Vol. 77 (1), pp. 29-41.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: The "gray zone" of myocardial fibrosis (GZF) on cardiovascular magnetic resonance may be a substrate for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs).<br />Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether GZF predicts sudden cardiac death (SCD) and VAs (ventricular fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and a wide range of left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs).<br />Methods: In this retrospective study of CAD patients, the presence of myocardial fibrosis on visual assessment (MF <subscript>VA</subscript> ) and GZF mass in patients with MF <subscript>VA</subscript> were assessed in relation to SCD and the composite, arrhythmic endpoint of SCD or VAs.<br />Results: Among 979 patients (mean age [± SD]: 65.8 ± 12.3 years), 29 (2.96%) experienced SCD and 80 (8.17%) met the arrhythmic endpoint over median 5.82 years (interquartile range: 4.1 to 7.3 years). In the whole cohort, MF <subscript>VA</subscript> was strongly associated with SCD (hazard ratio: 10.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42 to 1,278.9) and the arrhythmic endpoint (hazard ratio: 28.0; 95% CI: 4.07 to 3,525.4). In competing risks analyses, associations between LVEF <35% and SCD (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR]: 2.99; 95% CI: 1.42 to 6.31) and the arrhythmic endpoint (sHR: 4.71; 95% CI: 2.97 to 7.47) were weaker. In competing risk analyses of the MF <subscript>VA</subscript> subcohort (n = 832), GZF using the 3SD method (GZF <subscript>3SD</subscript> ) >5.0 g was strongly associated with SCD (sHR: 10.8; 95% CI: 3.74 to 30.9) and the arrhythmic endpoint (sHR: 7.40; 95% CI: 4.29 to 12.8). Associations between LVEF <35% and SCD (sHR: 2.62; 95% CI: 1.24 to 5.52) and the arrhythmic endpoint (sHR: 4.14; 95% CI: 2.61 to 6.57) were weaker.<br />Conclusions: In CAD patients, MF <subscript>VA</subscript> plus quantified GZF <subscript>3SD</subscript> mass was more strongly associated with SCD and VAs than LVEF. In selecting patients for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, assessment of MF <subscript>VA</subscript> followed by quantification of GZF <subscript>3SD</subscript> mass may be preferable to LVEF.<br />Competing Interests: Author Disclosures Medtronic provided support for this study in the form of an unrestricted educational grant. Medtronic provided funding for Dr. Zegard’s salary as a research fellow and had no participation in the study. Dr. Leyva has served as a consultant for and has received research funding from Medtronic Inc., Boston Scientific, Abbott, Microport, and Biotronik. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1558-3597
Volume :
77
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33413938
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.046