Back to Search Start Over

Renal Denervation for the Management of Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias: A Systematic Review.

Authors :
Hawson J
Harmer JA
Cowan M
Virk S
Campbell T
Bennett RG
Anderson RD
Kalman J
Lee G
Kumar S
Source :
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology [JACC Clin Electrophysiol] 2021 Jan; Vol. 7 (1), pp. 100-108. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Sep 30.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objectives: The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) in patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VA) or electrical storm (ES).<br />Background: Although catheter ablation is efficacious for the treatment of structural heart disease ventricular tachycardia (VT), there are proportion of patients who have refractory VT despite multiple procedures. In this setting, novel adjunctive therapies such as renal denervation have been performed.<br />Methods: A systematic review of published data was performed. Studies that evaluated patients undergoing RDN for VA or ES were included. Outcome measures of VA, sudden cardiac death, ES, or device therapy were required. Case reports, editorials, and conference presentations were excluded. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted to explore change or final mean values in the study outcomes.<br />Results: A total of 328 articles were identified by the literature search. Seven studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review, with a total of 121 pooled patients. The weighted mean age was 63.8 ± 13.1 years, ejection fraction 30.5 ± 10.3%, 76% were men, 99% were on a beta blocker, 79% were on amiodarone, 46% had previously undergone catheter ablation, and 8.3% had previously undergone cardiac sympathetic denervation. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant effect of RDN in reducing implantable cardiac defibrillator therapies, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -3.11 (p < 0.001). RDN also reduced the number of VA episodes (SMD -2.13; p < 0.001), antitachycardia pacing episodes (SMD -2.82; p = 0.002), and shocks (SMD -2.82; p = 0.002).<br />Conclusions: RDN is an effective treatment for refractory VAs and ES, although randomized data are lacking.<br />Competing Interests: Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2405-5018
Volume :
7
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33478701
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2020.07.019