Back to Search Start Over

Nocturnal respiratory rate predicts ICD benefit: A prospective, controlled, multicentre cohort study.

Authors :
Dommasch M
Steger A
Barthel P
Huster KM
Müller A
Sinnecker D
Laugwitz KL
Penzel T
Lubinski A
Flevari P
Harden M
Friede T
Kääb S
Merkely B
Sticherling C
Willems R
Huikuri HV
Bauer A
Malik M
Zabel M
Schmidt G
Source :
EClinicalMedicine [EClinicalMedicine] 2020 Dec 21; Vol. 31, pp. 100695. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Dec 21 (Print Publication: 2021).
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) prevent sudden cardiac death. ICD implantation decisions are currently based on reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF≤35%). However, in some patients, the non-arrhythmic death risk predominates thus diminishing ICD-therapy benefits. Based on previous observations, we tested the hypothesis that compared to the others, patients with nocturnal respiratory rate (NRR) ≥18 breaths per minute (brpm) benefit less from prophylactic ICD implantations.<br />Methods: This prospective cohort study was a pre-defined sub-study of EU-CERT-ICD trial conducted at 44 centers in 15 EU countries between May 12, 2014, and September 6, 2018. Patients with ischaemic or non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy were included if meeting primary prophylactic ICD implantation criteria. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. NRR was assessed blindly from pre-implantation 24-hour Holters. Multivariable models and propensity stratification evaluated the interaction between NRR and the ICD mortality effect. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT0206419).<br />Findings: Of the 2,247 EU-CERT-ICD patients, this sub-study included 1,971 with complete records. In 1,363 patients (61.7 (12) years; 244 women) an ICD was implanted; 608 patients (63.2 (12) years; 108 women) were treated conservatively. During a median 2.5-year follow-up, 202 (14.8%) and 95 (15.6%) patients died in the ICD and control groups, respectively. NRR statistically significantly interacted with the ICD mortality effect ( p  = 0.0070). While the 1,316 patients with NRR<18 brpm showed a marked ICD benefit on mortality (adjusted HR 0.529 (95% CI 0.376-0.746); p  = 0.0003), no treatment effect was demonstrated in 655 patients with NRR≥18 brpm (adjusted HR 0.981 (95% CI 0.669-1.438); p  = 0.9202).<br />Interpretation: In the EU-CERT-ICD trial, patients with NRR≥18 brpm showed limited benefit from primary prophylactic ICD implantation. Those with NRR<18 brpm benefitted substantially.<br />Funding: European Community's 7th Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013 (602299).<br />Competing Interests: MH and MM reports grant from European Commission. TF reports grant from European Commission and personal fees from Novartis, Bayer, Janssen, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Galapagos, Penumbra, Parexel, Vifor, BiosenseWebster, CSL Behring, Fresenius Kabi, and Coherex Medical. BM reports grants from Boston Scientific and Medtronic, and he reports personal fees from Biotronik and Abbott. RW reports grants from European Commission, Medtronic, Biotronik, Abbott, and Boston Scientific. He is funded as a postdoctoral clinical researcher by the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO Vlaanderen). MZ reports grants from European Commission and Biotronik. All other authors declare no competing interests.<br /> (© 2020 The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2589-5370
Volume :
31
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
EClinicalMedicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33554086
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100695