Back to Search
Start Over
Life cycle water footprint comparison of biomass-to-hydrogen and coal-to-hydrogen processes.
- Source :
-
The Science of the total environment [Sci Total Environ] 2021 Jun 15; Vol. 773, pp. 145056. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Feb 04. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Water is essential for the industrial production of hydrogen. This study investigates the production of hydrogen from biomass and coal. To date, there are few studies focusing on the water footprint of biomass-to-hydrogen and coal-to-hydrogen processes. This research conducted a life cycle water use analysis on wheat straw biomass and coal to hydrogen via pyrolysis gasification processes. The results show that the water consumption of the entire biomass-to-hydrogen process was 76.77 L/MJ, of which biomass cultivation was the dominant contributor (99%). Conversely, the water consumption of the coal-to-hydrogen process was only 1.06 L/MJ, wherein the coal production stage accounted for only 4.15% for the total water consumption, which is far lower than that of the biomass-to-hydrogen process. The hydrogen production stage of biomass hydrogen production accounted for 76% of the total water consumption when excluding the water consumption of straw growth, whereas that of the coal hydrogen production stage was 96%. This research provides the associated water consumption, within a specified boundary, of both hydrogen production processes, and the influence of major factors on total water consumption was demonstrated using sensitivity analysis.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1879-1026
- Volume :
- 773
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The Science of the total environment
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33582341
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145056