Back to Search
Start Over
Cost-Effectiveness of Direct Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Management of Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Based on Available "Real-World" Evidence: The Italian National Health System Perspective.
- Source :
-
Clinical drug investigation [Clin Drug Investig] 2021 Mar; Vol. 41 (3), pp. 255-267. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Feb 15. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Background and Objective: The increasing availability of real-world evidence (RWE) about safety and effectiveness of direct non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) offers the opportunity to better understand the clinical and economic implications of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The objective of this study was to compare the economic implications of DOACs and VKAs using data from real-world evidence in patients with AF.<br />Methods: A Markov model simulating the lifetime course of patients diagnosed with non-valvular AF was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DOACs (i.e., rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban) versus VKAs from the Italian National Health System (INHS) perspective. The model was made up of data from the literature and a meta-analysis of RWE on the incidence of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and all-cause mortality (ACM); direct costs included drug costs, costs for drug monitoring, and management of events from official national lists. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were used to assess the robustness of the results.<br />Results: Results from the meta-analysis showed that apixaban had a high probability of being the most effective for stroke/SE, MB and ACM. Despite their higher acquisition costs, the cost-effectiveness analysis showed all DOACs involved a saving when compared with VKAs, with per-patient savings ranging between €4647 (rivaroxaban) to €6086 (apixaban). Moreover, all DOACs indicated a gain both in quality-adjusted life-years and life-years. According to PSA, findings related to apixaban were consistent, while for dabigatran and rivaroxaban PSA revealed a higher degree of uncertainty.<br />Conclusions: The beneficial effect of DOACs on containing events showed in RWE had the potential to offset drug-related costs, thus improving the sustainability of treatment for non-valvular AF in daily clinical practice.
- Subjects :
- Administration, Oral
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Dabigatran therapeutic use
Female
Hemorrhage chemically induced
Humans
Italy
Male
Pyrazoles administration & dosage
Pyridones administration & dosage
Rivaroxaban therapeutic use
Stroke epidemiology
Anticoagulants therapeutic use
Atrial Fibrillation drug therapy
Vitamin K antagonists & inhibitors
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1179-1918
- Volume :
- 41
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Clinical drug investigation
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33587284
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-021-01002-z