Back to Search Start Over

A Primary Prevention Clinical Risk Score Model for Patients With Brugada Syndrome (BRUGADA-RISK).

Authors :
Honarbakhsh S
Providencia R
Garcia-Hernandez J
Martin CA
Hunter RJ
Lim WY
Kirkby C
Graham AJ
Sharifzadehgan A
Waldmann V
Marijon E
Munoz-Esparza C
Lacunza J
Gimeno-Blanes JR
Ankou B
Chevalier P
Antonio N
Elvas L
Castelletti S
Crotti L
Schwartz P
Scanavacca M
Darrieux F
Sacilotto L
Mueller-Leisse J
Veltmann C
Vicentini A
Demarchi A
Cortez-Dias N
Antonio PS
de Sousa J
Adragao P
Cavaco D
Costa FM
Khoueiry Z
Boveda S
Sousa MJ
Jebberi Z
Heck P
Mehta S
Conte G
Ozkartal T
Auricchio A
Lowe MD
Schilling RJ
Prieto-Merino D
Lambiase PD
Source :
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology [JACC Clin Electrophysiol] 2021 Feb; Vol. 7 (2), pp. 210-222. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Oct 28.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of this study was to develop a risk score model for patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS).<br />Background: Risk stratification in BrS is a significant challenge due to the low event rates and conflicting evidence.<br />Methods: A multicenter international cohort of patients with BrS and no previous cardiac arrest was used to evaluate the role of 16 proposed clinical or electrocardiogram (ECG) markers in predicting ventricular arrhythmias (VAs)/sudden cardiac death (SCD) during follow-up. Predictive markers were incorporated into a risk score model, and this model was validated by using out-of-sample cross-validation.<br />Results: A total of 1,110 patients with BrS from 16 centers in 8 countries were included (mean age 51.8 ± 13.6 years; 71.8% male). Median follow-up was 5.33 years; 114 patients had VA/SCD (10.3%) with an annual event rate of 1.5%. Of the 16 proposed risk factors, probable arrhythmia-related syncope (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.71; p < 0.001), spontaneous type 1 ECG (HR: 3.80; p < 0.001), early repolarization (HR: 3.42; p < 0.001), and a type 1 Brugada ECG pattern in peripheral leads (HR: 2.33; p < 0.001) were associated with a higher risk of VA/SCD. A risk score model incorporating these factors revealed a sensitivity of 71.2% (95% confidence interval: 61.5% to 84.6%) and a specificity of 80.2% (95% confidence interval: 75.7% to 82.3%) in predicting VA/SCD at 5 years. Calibration plots showed a mean prediction error of 1.2%. The model was effectively validated by using out-of-sample cross-validation according to country.<br />Conclusions: This multicenter study identified 4 risk factors for VA/SCD in a primary prevention BrS population. A risk score model was generated to quantify risk of VA/SCD in BrS and inform implantable cardioverter-defibrillator prescription.<br />Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr. Lambiase is supported by the Stephen Lyness Memorial Fund, UCLH Biomedicine National Institutes of Health Research, Barts Biomedical Research Centre; and has obtained research grants and speaker fees from Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2405-5018
Volume :
7
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33602402
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2020.08.032