Back to Search
Start Over
First-line Treatment with Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy for Premenopausal Women with Hormone-receptor-positive Advanced Breast Cancer: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.
- Source :
-
Clinical breast cancer [Clin Breast Cancer] 2021 Aug; Vol. 21 (4), pp. e479-e488. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Feb 04. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Background: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis incorporating recent phase III clinical trial (MONALEESA-7) data to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ribociclib (RIB) as a first-line treatment for premenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) from the United States healthcare payer perspective. In addition, because RIB has not been marketed in China, we identified the range of drug costs for which RIB could be considered cost effective from a Chinese healthcare system perspective.<br />Patients and Methods: A Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding RIB to endocrine therapy over a lifetime. The clinical outcomes and utility data were obtained from published literature. Costs data were obtained from United States and Chinese official websites, and we determined the potential price for RIB in China based on its price in the United States. The main outcomes of this study were the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).<br />Results: The model projected that mean outcome was better with RIB and endocrine combined (3.83366 QALYs) than with endocrine therapy alone (2.71203 QALYs). In the United States, RIB and endocrine therapy cost an additional $604,960.06, resulting in an ICER of $539,357.95/QALY compared with endocrine monotherapy. Subgroup analyses indicated that, in China, the projected mean outcomes were better for RIB and endocrine therapy (6.37 QALYs) than for endocrine monotherapy (2.71 QALYs). The corresponding incremental costs were $224,731.88943. Thus, the ICER comparing RIB and endocrine therapy with endocrine therapy alone represented a $61,454.96/QALY gain.<br />Conclusion: Additional use of RIB is estimated to not be cost effective as a first-line treatment for premenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative ABC in the United States. A value-based price for the cost of RIB is less than $31.74/200 mg for China.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Breast Neoplasms pathology
China
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Drug Therapy, Combination
Estrogen Antagonists administration & dosage
Estrogen Antagonists economics
Estrogen Receptor Modulators administration & dosage
Estrogen Receptor Modulators economics
Female
Humans
Markov Chains
Premenopause
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Receptor, ErbB-2
United States
Aminopyridines administration & dosage
Aminopyridines economics
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal economics
Breast Neoplasms drug therapy
Drug Costs
Purines administration & dosage
Purines economics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1938-0666
- Volume :
- 21
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Clinical breast cancer
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33676870
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2021.01.019