Back to Search
Start Over
Real-Life Management of Central and Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Seven-Year Follow-Up Study.
- Source :
-
Thrombosis and haemostasis [Thromb Haemost] 2021 Oct; Vol. 121 (10), pp. 1361-1366. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Mar 11. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Retinal vein occlusion is the second most common retinal vascular pathology after diabetic retinopathy and a major cause of vision impairment. Nowadays, both central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) can be well-managed by intravitreal treatments. However, considering the long-life expectance of the patients, few data are present in the literature about the very long-term outcome of CRVO and BRVO. The present study was an interventional, retrospective analysis of the morphological and functional long-term outcome of CRVO and BRVO patients, followed in an Italian referral center. We collected data from 313 eyes (178 CRVO eyes and 135 BRVO eyes). Mean follow-up was 45 ± 25 months (range 12-84 months). Both CRVO and BRVO eyes experience a significant visual acuity improvement secondary to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor/dexamethasone treatments (from 0.57 ± 0.25 to 0.41 ± 0.24 LogMAR in CRVO and from 0.53 ± 0.42 to 0.30 ± 0.41 LogMAR in BRVO, respectively) ( p < 0.01). Also, central macular thickness (CMT) resulted significant recovery at the end of the follow-up (from 585.54 ± 131.43 to 447.88 ± 245.07 μm in CRVO and from 585.54 ± 131.43 to 447.88 ± 245.07 μm in BRVO, respectively) ( p < 0.01). CRVO eyes received a mean of 10.70 ± 4.76 intravitreal treatments, whereas BRVO underwent 9.80 ± 5.39 injections over the entire 7-year follow-up. Our analyses highlighted different time points indicating the best obtainable improvement. This was the first year for CRVO (12-month follow-up) and the second year for BRVO (24-month follow-up). After these two time points, both visual acuity and CMT resulted stable up to the end of the follow-up. Ischemia was associated with significantly worse outcome.<br />Competing Interests: F.B. consultant for: Alcon (Fort Worth, Texas, USA), Alimera Sciences (Alpharetta, Georgia, USA), Allergan Inc (Irvine, California, USA), Farmila-Thea (Clermont-Ferrand, France), Bayer Shering-Pharma (Berlin, Germany), Bausch And Lomb (Rochester, New York, USA), Genentech (San Francisco, California, USA), Hoffmann-La-Roche (Basel, Switzerland), NovagaliPharma (Évry, France), Novartis (Basel, Switzerland), Sanofi-Aventis (Paris, France), Thrombogenics (Heverlee, Belgium), and Zeiss (Dublin, USA). All other authors have no disclosures to declare.<br /> (Thieme. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angiogenesis Inhibitors adverse effects
Dexamethasone adverse effects
Drug Implants
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glucocorticoids adverse effects
Humans
Intravitreal Injections
Italy
Macula Lutea diagnostic imaging
Macula Lutea physiopathology
Male
Middle Aged
Recovery of Function
Retinal Vein Occlusion diagnostic imaging
Retinal Vein Occlusion physiopathology
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A antagonists & inhibitors
Angiogenesis Inhibitors administration & dosage
Dexamethasone administration & dosage
Glucocorticoids administration & dosage
Macula Lutea drug effects
Retinal Vein Occlusion drug therapy
Visual Acuity drug effects
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2567-689X
- Volume :
- 121
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Thrombosis and haemostasis
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33706397
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1725197