Back to Search
Start Over
Validation study of the Access antimüllerian hormone assay for the prediction of poor ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation.
- Source :
-
Fertility and sterility [Fertil Steril] 2021 Aug; Vol. 116 (2), pp. 575-582. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Mar 31. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the antimüllerian hormone (AMH) level determined using the Access AMH assay for predicting poor ovarian response (POR) defined as ≤4 oocytes retrieved, including the validation of the predefined AMH cutoff of 0.93 ng/mL in both serum and plasma.<br />Design: Prospective cohort study.<br />Setting: Fifteen private and academic fertility centers (14 in the United States and 1 in Canada).<br />Patient(s): Women aged 21-45 years planning controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.<br />Intervention(s): None.<br />Main Outcome Measure(s): Number of oocytes retrieved, categorized as POR and normal-to-high ovarian response (non-POR). The correlation of AMH level and antral follicle count.<br />Result(s): Data were available for 472 participants who completed the study (74 with POR and 398 non-POR). The mean AMH serum level among those with POR was 0.99 ng/mL (median 0.76 ng/mL) compared with 2.83 ng/mL (median 2.36 ng/mL) among the normal-to-high responders. For confirmation of the 0.93 ng/mL AMH level cutoff as a predictor of POR, a receiver operating characteristic analysis gave an area under the curve of 0.852, with corresponding sensitivity and specificity of 63.5% and 89.2%, respectively. The associated positive predictive value was 52.2% and the negative predictive value was 92.9%. The AMH plasma values demonstrated a strong correlation with AMH serum values with an r value = 0.9980. The previously established AMH cutoff of 1.77 ng/mL for antral follicle count >15 resulted in a sensitivity of 83.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 77.7-88.5) and a specificity of 59.9% (95% CI 54.2-65.4).<br />Conclusion(s): This study validated the previously established AMH cut-point for the prediction of POR. Because this cut-point may vary depending on the assay used, the specific AMH assay should be reported in the literature whenever possible.<br /> (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1556-5653
- Volume :
- 116
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Fertility and sterility
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33812650
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.01.056