Back to Search Start Over

Identifying advanced stage NSCLC patients who benefit from afatinib therapy using 18 F-afatinib PET/CT imaging.

Authors :
van de Stadt EA
Yaqub M
Lammertsma AA
Poot AJ
Schuit RC
Remmelzwaal S
Schwarte LA
Smit EF
Hendrikse H
Bahce I
Source :
Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) [Lung Cancer] 2021 May; Vol. 155, pp. 156-162. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Mar 26.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objectives: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors harboring common (exon19del, L858R) and uncommon (e.g. G719X, L861Q) activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are best treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) such as the first-generation EGFR TKI erlotinib, second-generation afatinib or third-generation osimertinib. However, identifying these patients through biopsy is not always possible. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate whether <superscript>18</superscript> F-afatinib PET/CT could identify patients with common and uncommon EGFR mutations. Furthermore, we evaluated the relation between tumor <superscript>18</superscript> F-afatinib uptake and response to afatinib therapy.<br />Materials and Methods: <superscript>18</superscript> F-afatinib PET/CT was performed in 12 patients: 6 EGFR wild type (WT), 3 EGFR common and 3 EGFR uncommon mutations. Tumor uptake of <superscript>18</superscript> F-afatinib was quantified using TBR_WB <subscript>60-90</subscript> (tumor-to-whole blood activity ratio 60-90 min post-injection) for each tumor. Response was quantified per lesion using percentage of change (PC): [(response measurement (RM)-baseline measurement (BM))/BM]×100. Statistical analyses were performed using t-tests, correlation plots and sensitivity/specificity analysis.<br />Results: Twenty-one tumors were identified. Injected dose was 348 ± 31 MBq. Group differences were significant between WT versus EGFR (common and uncommon) activating mutations (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference between EGFR common versus uncommon mutations (p = 0.94). A TBR_WB <subscript>60-90</subscript> cut-off value of 6 showed the best relationship with response with a sensitivity of 70 %, a specificity of 100 % and a positive predictive value of 100 %.<br />Conclusion: <superscript>18</superscript> F-afatinib uptake was higher in tumors with EGFR mutations (common and uncommon) compared to WT. Furthermore, a TBR_WB <subscript>60-90</subscript> cut-off of 6 was found to best predict response to therapy. <superscript>18</superscript> F-afatinib PET/CT could provide a means to identify EGFR mutation positive patients who benefit from afatinib therapy.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1872-8332
Volume :
155
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33836373
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.03.016