Back to Search
Start Over
Trauma Center Outcomes After Transition From Level 2 to Level 1: A National Trauma Data Bank Analysis.
- Source :
-
The Journal of surgical research [J Surg Res] 2021 Aug; Vol. 264, pp. 499-509. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Apr 13. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Background: Previous US-based studies have shown that a trauma center designation of level 1 is associated with improved patient outcomes. However, most studies are cross-sectional, focus on volume-related issues and are direct comparisons between levels. This study investigates the change in patient characteristics when individual trauma centers transition from level 2 to level 1 and whether the patients have similar outcomes during the initial period of the transition.<br />Study Design: We performed a retrospective cohort study that analyzed hospital and patient records included in the National Trauma Data Bank from 2007 to 2016. Patient characteristics were compared before and after their hospitals transitioned their trauma level. Mortality; complications including acute kidney injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, cardiac arrest with CPR, deep surgical site infection, deep vein thrombosis, extremity compartment syndrome, surgical site infection, osteomyelitis, pulmonary embolism, and so on; ICU admission; ventilation use; unplanned returns to the OR; unplanned ICU transfers; unplanned intubations; and lengths of stay were obtained following propensity score matching, comparing posttransition years with the last pretransition year.<br />Results: Sixteen trauma centers transitioned from level 2 to level 1 between 2007 and 2016. One was excluded due to missing data. After transition, patient characteristics showed differences in the distribution of race, comorbidities, insurance status, injury severity scores, injury mechanisms, and injury type. After propensity score matching, patients treated in a trauma center after transition from level 2 to 1 required significantly fewer ICU admissions and had lower complication rates. However, significantly more unplanned intubations, unplanned returns to the OR, unplanned ICU transfers, ventilation use, surgical site infections, pneumonia, and urinary tract infections and higher mortality were reported after the transition.<br />Conclusions: Trauma centers that transitioned from level 2 to level 1 had lower overall complications, with fewer patients requiring ICU admission. However, higher mortality and more surgical site infections, pneumonia, urinary tract infections, unplanned intubations, and unplanned ICU transfers were reported after the transition. These findings may have significant implications in the planning of trauma systems for administrators and healthcare leaders.<br /> (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Subjects :
- Accreditation standards
Adult
Aged
Databases, Factual statistics & numerical data
Female
Hospital Mortality
Hospitals, High-Volume standards
Humans
Injury Severity Score
Intensive Care Units statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Operating Rooms statistics & numerical data
Postoperative Complications etiology
Retrospective Studies
Surgical Procedures, Operative statistics & numerical data
Trauma Centers organization & administration
Trauma Centers standards
United States epidemiology
Wounds and Injuries complications
Wounds and Injuries diagnosis
Wounds and Injuries mortality
Hospitals, High-Volume statistics & numerical data
Postoperative Complications epidemiology
Surgical Procedures, Operative adverse effects
Trauma Centers statistics & numerical data
Wounds and Injuries surgery
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1095-8673
- Volume :
- 264
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The Journal of surgical research
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 33857794
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.03.021