Back to Search Start Over

Eosinophilic and Noneosinophilic Asthma: An Expert Consensus Framework to Characterize Phenotypes in a Global Real-Life Severe Asthma Cohort.

Authors :
Heaney LG
Perez de Llano L
Al-Ahmad M
Backer V
Busby J
Canonica GW
Christoff GC
Cosio BG
FitzGerald JM
Heffler E
Iwanaga T
Jackson DJ
Menzies-Gow AN
Papadopoulos NG
Papaioannou AI
Pfeffer PE
Popov TA
Porsbjerg CM
Rhee CK
Sadatsafavi M
Tohda Y
Wang E
Wechsler ME
Alacqua M
Altraja A
Bjermer L
Björnsdóttir US
Bourdin A
Brusselle GG
Buhl R
Costello RW
Hew M
Koh MS
Lehmann S
Lehtimäki L
Peters M
Taillé C
Taube C
Tran TN
Zangrilli J
Bulathsinhala L
Carter VA
Chaudhry I
Eleangovan N
Hosseini N
Kerkhof M
Murray RB
Price CA
Price DB
Source :
Chest [Chest] 2021 Sep; Vol. 160 (3), pp. 814-830. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Apr 19.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Phenotypic characteristics of patients with eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma are not well characterized in global, real-life severe asthma cohorts.<br />Research Question: What is the prevalence of eosinophilic and noneosinophilic phenotypes in the population with severe asthma, and can these phenotypes be differentiated by clinical and biomarker variables?<br />Study Design and Methods: This was an historical registry study. Adult patients with severe asthma and available blood eosinophil count (BEC) from 11 countries enrolled in the International Severe Asthma Registry (January 1, 2015-September 30, 2019) were categorized according to likelihood of eosinophilic phenotype using a predefined gradient eosinophilic algorithm based on highest BEC, long-term oral corticosteroid use, elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide, nasal polyps, and adult-onset asthma. Demographic and clinical characteristics were defined at baseline (ie, 1 year before or closest to date of BEC).<br />Results: One thousand seven hundred sixteen patients with prospective data were included; 83.8% were identified as most likely (grade 3), 8.3% were identified as likely (grade 2), and 6.3% identified as least likely (grade 1) to have an eosinophilic phenotype, and 1.6% of patients showed a noneosinophilic phenotype (grade 0). Eosinophilic phenotype patients (ie, grades 2 or 3) showed later asthma onset (29.1 years vs 6.7 years; P < .001) and worse lung function (postbronchodilator % predicted FEV <subscript>1</subscript> , 76.1% vs 89.3%; P = .027) than those with a noneosinophilic phenotype. Patients with noneosinophilic phenotypes were more likely to be women (81.5% vs 62.9%; P = .047), to have eczema (20.8% vs 8.5%; P = .003), and to use anti-IgE (32.1% vs 13.4%; P = .004) and leukotriene receptor antagonists (50.0% vs 28.0%; P = .011) add-on therapy.<br />Interpretation: According to this multicomponent, consensus-driven, and evidence-based eosinophil gradient algorithm (using variables readily accessible in real life), the severe asthma eosinophilic phenotype was more prevalent than previously identified and was phenotypically distinct. This pragmatic gradient algorithm uses variables readily accessible in primary and specialist care, addressing inherent issues of phenotype heterogeneity and phenotype instability. Identification of treatable traits across phenotypes should improve therapeutic precision.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1931-3543
Volume :
160
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Chest
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33887242
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.04.013