Back to Search Start Over

Cost Effectiveness of Ranibizumab vs Aflibercept vs Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Macular Oedema Due to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: The LEAVO Study.

Authors :
Pennington B
Alshreef A
Flight L
Metry A
Poku E
Hykin P
Sivaprasad S
Prevost AT
Vasconcelos JC
Murphy C
Kelly J
Yang Y
Lotery A
Williams M
Brazier J
Source :
PharmacoEconomics [Pharmacoeconomics] 2021 Aug; Vol. 39 (8), pp. 913-927. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Apr 26.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: We aimed to assess the cost effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis), aflibercept (Eylea) and bevacizumab (Avastin) for the treatment of macular oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion.<br />Methods: We calculated costs and quality-adjusted life-years from the UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective. We performed a within-trial analysis using the efficacy, safety, resource use and health utility data from a randomised controlled trial (LEAVO) over 100 weeks. We built a discrete event simulation to model long-term outcomes. We estimated utilities using the Visual-Functioning Questionnaire-Utility Index, EQ-5D and EQ-5D with an additional vision question. We used standard UK costs sources for 2018/19 and a cost of £28 per bevacizumab injection. We discounted costs and quality-adjusted life-years at 3.5% annually.<br />Results: Bevacizumab was the least costly intervention followed by ranibizumab and aflibercept in both the within-trial analysis (bevacizumab: £6292, ranibizumab: £13,014, aflibercept: £14,328) and long-term model (bevacizumab: £18,353, ranibizumab: £30,226, aflibercept: £35,026). Although LEAVO did not demonstrate bevacizumab to be non-inferior for the visual acuity primary outcome, the three interventions generated similar quality-adjusted life-years in both analyses. Bevacizumab was always the most cost-effective intervention at a threshold of £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, even using the list price of £243 per injection.<br />Conclusions: Wider adoption of bevacizumab for the treatment of macular oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion could result in substantial savings to healthcare systems and deliver similar health-related quality of life. However, patients, funders and ophthalmologists should be fully aware that LEAVO could not demonstrate that bevacizumab is non-inferior to the licensed agents.<br /> (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1179-2027
Volume :
39
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
PharmacoEconomics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33900585
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-021-01026-5