Back to Search Start Over

Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial for Stepping Down Asthma Controller Treatment in Patients Controlled with Low-Dose Inhaled Corticosteroid and Long-Acting β 2 -Agonist: Step-Down of Intervention and Grade in Moderate Asthma Study.

Authors :
Kim SH
Lee T
Jang AS
Park CS
Jung JW
Kim MH
Kwon JW
Moon JY
Yang MS
Lee J
Choi JH
Shin YS
Kim HK
Kim S
Kim JH
Lee SY
Nam YH
Kim SH
Kim TB
Source :
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice [J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract] 2021 Oct; Vol. 9 (10), pp. 3638-3646.e3. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 May 01.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Current asthma guidelines recommend stepping down controller treatment when the condition is well-controlled for a certain time. However, the optimal step-down strategy for well-controlled patients receiving a low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with a long-acting β <subscript>2</subscript> -agonist (LABA) remains unclear.<br />Objective: This study was a randomized, open-label, three-arm, parallel pragmatic trial comparing two kinds of step-down approaches for maintaining treatment.<br />Methods: Adults with asthma who were aged 18 years or older, and who had been stable with low-dose ICS/LABA for at least 3 months, were enrolled. Subjects (n = 225) were randomly allocated into one of three groups (maintaining low-dose ICS/LABA [G1], discontinuing LABA [G2], and reducing ICS/LABA to once daily [G3]), and were observed for 6 months. The primary end point was a change in Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores between randomization and the final 6-month follow-up.<br />Results: The change in ACT was analyzed in the per-protocol population; noninferiority was not demonstrated in either step-down group compared with the maintenance group (95% confidence interval of the difference, G2 vs G1 = -1.40-0.55; G3 vs G1 = -1.19-0.77). Although over 90% of patients were fine, higher rates of treatment failure were observed in step-down groups (G1: 0%; G2: 9.46%; and G3: 9.09%; P = .027). There were no significant differences between step-down approaches in terms of ACT change or treatment failure.<br />Conclusions: Both step-down methods were not noninferior to maintenance of treatment. Step-down therapy can be attempted when patients are stable, but appropriate monitoring and supervision are necessary with precautions regarding loss of disease control.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2213-2201
Volume :
9
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33940213
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2021.04.042