Back to Search Start Over

The application of a workflow integrating the variable reproducibility and harmonizability of radiomic features on a phantom dataset.

Authors :
Ibrahim A
Refaee T
Leijenaar RTH
Primakov S
Hustinx R
Mottaghy FM
Woodruff HC
Maidment ADA
Lambin P
Source :
PloS one [PLoS One] 2021 May 07; Vol. 16 (5), pp. e0251147. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 May 07 (Print Publication: 2021).
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Radiomics-the high throughput extraction of quantitative features from medical images and their correlation with clinical and biological endpoints- is the subject of active and extensive research. Although the field shows promise, the generalizability of radiomic signatures is affected significantly by differences in scan acquisition and reconstruction settings. Previous studies reported on the sensitivity of radiomic features (RFs) to test-retest variability, inter-observer segmentation variability, and intra-scanner variability. A framework involving robust radiomics analysis and the application of a post-reconstruction feature harmonization method using ComBat was recently proposed to address these challenges. In this study, we investigated the reproducibility of RFs across different scanners and scanning parameters using this framework. We analysed thirteen scans of a ten-layer phantom that were acquired differently. Each layer was subdivided into sixteen regions of interest (ROIs), and the scans were compared in a pairwise manner, resulting in seventy-eight different scenarios. Ninety-one RFs were extracted from each ROI. As hypothesized, we demonstrate that the reproducibility of a given RF is not a constant but is dependent on the heterogeneity found in the data under analysis. The number (%) of reproducible RFs varied across the pairwise scenarios investigated, having a wide range between 8 (8.8%) and 78 (85.7%) RFs. Furthermore, in contrast to what has been previously reported, and as hypothesized in the robust radiomics analysis framework, our results demonstrate that ComBat cannot be applied to all RFs but rather on a percentage of those-the "ComBatable" RFs-which differed depending on the data being harmonized. The number (%) of reproducible RFs following ComBat harmonization varied across the pairwise scenarios investigated, ranging from 14 (15.4%) to 80 (87.9%) RFs, and was found to depend on the heterogeneity in the data. We conclude that the standardization of image acquisition protocols remains the cornerstone for improving the reproducibility of RFs, and the generalizability of the signatures developed. Our proposed approach helps identify the reproducible RFs across different datasets.<br />Competing Interests: Dr. Philippe Lambin reports, within and outside the submitted work, grants/sponsored research agreements from Varian medical, Oncoradiomics, ptTheragnostic and Health Innovation Ventures. He received an advisor/presenter fee and/or reimbursement of travel costs/external grant writing fee and/or in kind manpower contribution from Oncoradiomics, BHV, Merck, Varian, Elekta and Convert pharmaceuticals. Dr. Lambin has (minority) shares in the company Oncoradiomics, MedC2, LivingMed Biotech and Convert pharmaceuticals and is co-inventor of two issued patents with royalties on radiomics (PCT/NL2014/050248, PCT/NL2014/050728) licensed to Oncoradiomics and one issue patent on mtDNA (PCT/EP2014/059089) licensed to ptTheragnostic/DNAmito, three nonpatentable invention (softwares) licensed to ptTheragnostic/DNAmito, Oncoradiomics and Health Innovation Ventures. Dr. Woodruff, and Dr. Leijenaar have (minority) shares in the company Oncoradiomics. Dr. Mottaghy received an advisor fee and reimbursement of travel costs from Oncoradiomics. He reports institutional grants from GE and Nanomab outside the submitted work. The rest of authors declare no competing interest. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1932-6203
Volume :
16
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
PloS one
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
33961646
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251147