Back to Search Start Over

A randomized evaluation of the TriGuard™ HDH cerebral embolic protection device to Reduce the Impact of Cerebral Embolic LEsions after TransCatheter Aortic Valve ImplanTation: the REFLECT I trial.

Authors :
Lansky AJ
Makkar R
Nazif T
Messé S
Forrest J
Sharma R
Schofer J
Linke A
Brown D
Dhoble A
Horwitz P
Zang M
DeMarco F
Rajagopal V
Dwyer MG
Zivadinov R
Stella P
Rovin J
Parise H
Kodali S
Baumbach A
Moses J
Source :
European heart journal [Eur Heart J] 2021 Jul 15; Vol. 42 (27), pp. 2670-2679.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Aims: The REFLECT I trial investigated the safety and effectiveness of the TriGuard™ HDH (TG) cerebral embolic deflection device in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).<br />Methods and Results: This prospective, multicentre, single-blind, 2:1 randomized (TG vs. no TG) study aimed to enrol up to 375 patients, including up to 90 roll-in patients. The primary combined safety endpoint (VARC-2 defined early safety) at 30 days was compared with a performance goal. The primary efficacy endpoint was a hierarchical composite of (i) all-cause mortality or any stroke at 30 days, (ii) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) worsening at 2-5 days or Montreal Cognitive Assessment worsening at 30 days, and (iii) total volume of cerebral ischaemic lesions detected by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 2-5 days. Cumulative scores were compared between treatment groups using the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld method. A total of 258 of the planned, 375 patients (68.8%) were enrolled (54 roll-in and 204 randomized). The primary safety outcome was met compared with the performance goal (21.8% vs. 35%, P < 0.0001). The primary hierarchical efficacy endpoint was not met (mean efficacy score, higher is better: -5.3 ± 99.8 TG vs. 11.8 ± 96.4 control, P = 0.31). Covert central nervous system injury was numerically lower with TG both in-hospital (46.1% vs. 60.3%, P = 0.0698) and at 5 days (61.7 vs. 76.2%, P = 0.054) compared with controls.<br />Conclusion: REFLECT I demonstrated that TG cerebral protection during TAVR was safe in comparison with historical TAVR data but did not meet the predefined effectiveness endpoint compared with unprotected TAVR controls.<br /> (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1522-9645
Volume :
42
Issue :
27
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European heart journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34000004
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab213