Comparing helpful and hindering processes in good and poor outcome cases: A qualitative metasynthesis of eight Hermeneutic Single Case Efficacy Design studies.

MLA

Stephen, Susan, et al. “Comparing Helpful and Hindering Processes in Good and Poor Outcome Cases: A Qualitative Metasynthesis of Eight Hermeneutic Single Case Efficacy Design Studies.” Psychotherapy Research : Journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, vol. 32, no. 3, Mar. 2022, pp. 389–403. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2021.1934746.

APA

Stephen, S., Bell, L., Khan, M., Love, R., Macintosh, H., Martin, M., Moran, R., Price, E., Whitehead, B., & Elliott, R. (2022). Comparing helpful and hindering processes in good and poor outcome cases: A qualitative metasynthesis of eight Hermeneutic Single Case Efficacy Design studies. Psychotherapy Research : Journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, 32(3), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2021.1934746

Chicago

Stephen, Susan, Laura Bell, Maha Khan, Ruth Love, Hannah Macintosh, Melanie Martin, Rebecca Moran, Emily Price, Brigid Whitehead, and Robert Elliott. 2022. “Comparing Helpful and Hindering Processes in Good and Poor Outcome Cases: A Qualitative Metasynthesis of Eight Hermeneutic Single Case Efficacy Design Studies.” Psychotherapy Research : Journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research 32 (3): 389–403. doi:10.1080/10503307.2021.1934746.