Back to Search Start Over

Nationwide multicentre comparison of preoperative biometry and predictability of cataract surgery in Japan.

Authors :
Kamiya K
Hayashi K
Tanabe M
Tabuchi H
Sato M
Gotoh N
Kojima T
Hatsusaka N
Source :
The British journal of ophthalmology [Br J Ophthalmol] 2022 Sep; Vol. 106 (9), pp. 1227-1234. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jun 09.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Aim: To compare the preoperative biometric data and the refractive accuracy of cataract surgery among major surgical sites in a nationwide multicentre study.<br />Methods: We prospectively obtained the preoperative biometric data of 2143 eyes of 2143 consecutive patients undergoing standard cataract surgery at major 12 facilities and compared the preoperative biometry as well as the postoperative refractive accuracy among them.<br />Results: We found significant differences in most preoperative variables, such as axial length (one-way analysis of variance, p=0.003), anterior chamber depth (p<0.001), lens thickness (p<0.001) and central corneal thickness (p<0.001), except for mean keratometry (p=0.587) and corneal astigmatism (p=0.304), among the 12 surgical sites. The prediction error using the Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff/Theoretical (SRK/T formula was significantly more hyperopic than that using the Barrett Universal II formula (paired t-test, p<0.001). The absolute error using the SRK/T formula was significantly larger than that using the Barrett Universal II formula (p=0.016). The prediction error using the SRK/T formula was significantly more hyperopic than that using the Barrett Universal II formula at 10 of 12 institutions, but significantly more myopic at one institution. The absolute error using the SRK/T formula was significantly larger than that using the Barrett Universal II formula at 4 of 12 institutions but significantly smaller at two institutions.<br />Conclusions: Regional divergences of the preoperative biometry were not necessarily negligible, and the optimised intraocular lens power calculation formula was individually different among the 12 facilities. Our findings highlight the importance of individual optimisation of these formulas at each facility, especially in consideration of these biometric variations.Trial registration numberClinical Trial Registry; 000039976.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1468-2079
Volume :
106
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The British journal of ophthalmology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34108223
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-318825