Back to Search
Start Over
Perioperative liberal versus restrictive fluid strategies and postoperative outcomes: a systematic review and metanalysis on randomised-controlled trials in major abdominal elective surgery.
- Source :
-
Critical care (London, England) [Crit Care] 2021 Jun 11; Vol. 25 (1), pp. 205. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jun 11. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Background: Postoperative complications impact on early and long-term patients' outcome. Appropriate perioperative fluid management is pivotal in this context; however, the most effective perioperative fluid management is still unclear. The enhanced recovery after surgery pathways recommend a perioperative zero-balance, whereas recent findings suggest a more liberal approach could be beneficial. We conducted this trial to address the impact of restrictive vs. liberal fluid approaches on overall postoperative complications and mortality.<br />Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We performed a systematic literature search using MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid) and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical trials register databases, published from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2019. We included RCTs enrolling adult patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery and comparing the use of restrictive/liberal approaches enrolling at least 15 patients in each subgroup. Studies involving cardiac, non-elective surgery, paediatric or obstetric surgeries were excluded.<br />Results: After full-text examination, the metanalysis finally included 18 studies and 5567 patients randomised to restrictive (2786 patients; 50.0%) or liberal approaches (2780 patients; 50.0%). We found no difference in the occurrence of severe postoperative complications between restrictive and liberal subgroups [risk difference (95% CI) = 0.009 (- 0.02; 0.04); p value = 0.62; I <subscript>2</subscript> (95% CI) = 38.6% (0-66.9%)]. This result was confirmed also in the subgroup of five studies having a low overall risk of bias. The liberal approach was associated with lower overall renal major events, as compared to the restrictive [risk difference (95% CI) = 0.06 (0.02-0.09); p value = 0.001]. We found no difference in either early (p value = 0.33) or late (p value = 0.22) postoperative mortality between restrictive and liberal subgroups CONCLUSIONS: In major abdominal elective surgery perioperative, the choice between liberal or restrictive approach did not affect overall major postoperative complications or mortality. In a subgroup analysis, a liberal as compared to a restrictive perioperative fluid policy was associated with lower overall complication renal major events, as compared to the restrictive.<br />Trial Registration: CRD42020218059; Registration: February 2020, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display&#95;record.php?RecordID=218059 .
- Subjects :
- Digestive System Surgical Procedures standards
Humans
Outcome Assessment, Health Care trends
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic statistics & numerical data
Digestive System Surgical Procedures methods
Fluid Therapy methods
Fluid Therapy standards
Outcome Assessment, Health Care standards
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1466-609X
- Volume :
- 25
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Critical care (London, England)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 34116707
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03629-y