Back to Search Start Over

Hypothermia versus Normothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Authors :
Dankiewicz J
Cronberg T
Lilja G
Jakobsen JC
Levin H
Ullén S
Rylander C
Wise MP
Oddo M
Cariou A
Bělohlávek J
Hovdenes J
Saxena M
Kirkegaard H
Young PJ
Pelosi P
Storm C
Taccone FS
Joannidis M
Callaway C
Eastwood GM
Morgan MPG
Nordberg P
Erlinge D
Nichol AD
Chew MS
Hollenberg J
Thomas M
Bewley J
Sweet K
Grejs AM
Christensen S
Haenggi M
Levis A
Lundin A
Düring J
Schmidbauer S
Keeble TR
Karamasis GV
Schrag C
Faessler E
Smid O
Otáhal M
Maggiorini M
Wendel Garcia PD
Jaubert P
Cole JM
Solar M
Borgquist O
Leithner C
Abed-Maillard S
Navarra L
Annborn M
Undén J
Brunetti I
Awad A
McGuigan P
Bjørkholt Olsen R
Cassina T
Vignon P
Langeland H
Lange T
Friberg H
Nielsen N
Source :
The New England journal of medicine [N Engl J Med] 2021 Jun 17; Vol. 384 (24), pp. 2283-2294.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Targeted temperature management is recommended for patients after cardiac arrest, but the supporting evidence is of low certainty.<br />Methods: In an open-label trial with blinded assessment of outcomes, we randomly assigned 1900 adults with coma who had had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac or unknown cause to undergo targeted hypothermia at 33°C, followed by controlled rewarming, or targeted normothermia with early treatment of fever (body temperature, ≥37.8°C). The primary outcome was death from any cause at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included functional outcome at 6 months as assessed with the modified Rankin scale. Prespecified subgroups were defined according to sex, age, initial cardiac rhythm, time to return of spontaneous circulation, and presence or absence of shock on admission. Prespecified adverse events were pneumonia, sepsis, bleeding, arrhythmia resulting in hemodynamic compromise, and skin complications related to the temperature management device.<br />Results: A total of 1850 patients were evaluated for the primary outcome. At 6 months, 465 of 925 patients (50%) in the hypothermia group had died, as compared with 446 of 925 (48%) in the normothermia group (relative risk with hypothermia, 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 1.14; P = 0.37). Of the 1747 patients in whom the functional outcome was assessed, 488 of 881 (55%) in the hypothermia group had moderately severe disability or worse (modified Rankin scale score ≥4), as compared with 479 of 866 (55%) in the normothermia group (relative risk with hypothermia, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.09). Outcomes were consistent in the prespecified subgroups. Arrhythmia resulting in hemodynamic compromise was more common in the hypothermia group than in the normothermia group (24% vs. 17%, P<0.001). The incidence of other adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups.<br />Conclusions: In patients with coma after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, targeted hypothermia did not lead to a lower incidence of death by 6 months than targeted normothermia. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; TTM2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02908308.).<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1533-4406
Volume :
384
Issue :
24
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The New England journal of medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34133859
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2100591