Back to Search Start Over

Variations in deceased donor kidney procurement biopsy practice patterns: A survey of U.S. organ procurement organizations.

Authors :
Emmons BR
Husain SA
King KL
Adler JT
Mohan S
Source :
Clinical transplantation [Clin Transplant] 2021 Sep; Vol. 35 (9), pp. e14411. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 14.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Procurement biopsies have become a common practice in the evaluation and allocation of deceased donor kidneys in the United States despite questions about their value and reproducibility. We sought to determine the extent of OPO-level differences in criteria used to decide which deceased donor kidneys undergo a procurement biopsy and to assess the degree of variability in procurement biopsy technique and interpretation across OPOs.<br />Methods: Each of the country's 58 OPOs were invited to participate in the survey. OPOs were divided into two groups based on organ availability ratio and deceased donor kidney discard rate.<br />Results and Conclusions: Fifty-out-of-fifty-eight invited OPOs (86% response rate) responded to the survey between November 2020 and December 2020. Thirty (60%) OPOs reported that they have formal criteria for performing kidney procurement biopsy, but for 29 of these OPOs, transplant centers can request biopsy on kidneys that do not meet criteria. OPOs used a total of seven different variables and 12 different numerical thresholds to define impaired kidney function that would prompt a procurement biopsy. Additionally, wide variability was seen in biopsy technique and procedures for biopsy interpretation and reporting of findings to transplant programs. These findings identify a clear opportunity for standardization of procurement biopsies to best practices.<br /> (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1399-0012
Volume :
35
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical transplantation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34196034
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.14411