Back to Search Start Over

Predictive Immune-Checkpoint Blockade Classifiers Identify Tumors Responding to Inhibition of PD-1 and/or CTLA-4.

Authors :
Krijgsman O
Kemper K
Boshuizen J
Vredevoogd DW
Rozeman EA
Ibanez Molero S
de Bruijn B
Cornelissen-Steijger P
Shahrabi A
Del Castillo Velasco-Herrera M
Song JY
Ligtenberg MA
Kluin RJC
Kuilman T
Ross-Macdonald P
Haanen JBAG
Adams DJ
Blank CU
Peeper DS
Source :
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research [Clin Cancer Res] 2021 Oct 01; Vol. 27 (19), pp. 5389-5400.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Purpose: Combining anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4 immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) shows improved patient benefit, but it is associated with severe immune-related adverse events and exceedingly high cost. Therefore, there is a dire need to predict which patients respond to monotherapy and which require combination ICB treatment.<br />Experimental Design: In patient-derived melanoma xenografts (PDX), human tumor microenvironment (TME) cells were swiftly replaced by murine cells upon transplantation. Using our XenofilteR deconvolution algorithm we curated human tumor cell RNA reads, which were subsequently subtracted in silico from bulk (tumor cell + TME) patients' melanoma RNA. This produced a purely tumor cell-intrinsic signature ("InTumor") and a signature comprising tumor cell-extrinsic RNA reads ("ExTumor").<br />Results: We show that whereas the InTumor signature predicts response to anti-PD-1, the ExTumor predicts anti-CTLA-4 benefit. In PDX, InTumorLO, but not InTumorHI, tumors are effectively eliminated by cytotoxic T cells. When used in conjunction, the InTumor and ExTumor signatures identify not only patients who have a substantially higher chance of responding to combination treatment than to either monotherapy, but also those who are likely to benefit little from anti-CTLA-4 on top of anti-PD-1.<br />Conclusions: These signatures may be exploited to distinguish melanoma patients who need combination ICB blockade from those who likely benefit from either monotherapy.<br /> (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1557-3265
Volume :
27
Issue :
19
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34230026
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4218