Back to Search
Start Over
Survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: Thrombotic and bleeding events among different oral P2Y 12 inhibitor regimens.
- Source :
-
Archives of cardiovascular diseases [Arch Cardiovasc Dis] 2021 Aug-Sep; Vol. 114 (8-9), pp. 577-587. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 10. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Background: Survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are at high thrombotic and bleeding risk. The type of antiplatelet that should be used in these patients remains controversial.<br />Aim: To compare the impact of the use of more potent P2Y <subscript>12</subscript> receptor inhibitors on thrombotic and bleeding events with that of clopidogrel in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.<br />Methods: This was an observational study including consecutive patients treated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest associated with acute coronary syndrome by percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation and dual antiplatelet therapy between January 2007 and December 2017. Baseline characteristics, mortality and in-hospital haemorrhagic and thrombotic events were compared between patients who received clopidogrel and those who received more potent P2Y <subscript>12</subscript> receptor inhibitors.<br />Results: Among the 359 included patients, 197 received clopidogrel and 162 received ticagrelor or prasugrel. The primary composite endpoint of death, definite stent thrombosis or major bleeding was similar in the two groups (57.4% in the clopidogrel group vs. 53.7% in the new P2Y <subscript>12</subscript> receptor inhibitors group; P=0.49). Fewer haemorrhagic events occurred in the clopidogrel group (21.8% vs. 31.5%; P=0.04), whereas similar rates of definite stent thrombosis were observed (5.1% vs. 6.2%; P=0.65). The use of more potent P2Y <subscript>12</subscript> receptor inhibitors was an independent predictor of major bleeding (odds ratio 2.69, 95% confidence interval 1.37-5.25; P=0.004).<br />Conclusions: In this specific population, the use of more potent P2Y <subscript>12</subscript> receptor inhibitors was not associated with a reduced thrombosis rate compared with clopidogrel, but with a higher haemorrhagic risk. Prospective studies should be performed on the optimal antithrombotic therapy in this subset of patients.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Hemorrhage chemically induced
Humans
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors adverse effects
Prasugrel Hydrochloride adverse effects
Prospective Studies
Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists adverse effects
Survivors
Ticlopidine
Treatment Outcome
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest diagnosis
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest therapy
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention adverse effects
Thrombosis
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1875-2128
- Volume :
- 114
- Issue :
- 8-9
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Archives of cardiovascular diseases
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 34257048
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2021.06.005