Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Humeral Shaft Nonunion: Bone Grafting Is Not Routinely Required and Avoids Donor Site Morbidity.

Objectives: To document union rate, complications and patient-reported outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), with and without bone grafting (BG), for humeral diaphyseal nonunion after failed nonoperative management.
Design: Retrospective.
Setting: University teaching hospital.
Patients and Intervention: From 2008 to 2017, 86 consecutive patients [mean age 59 years (range 17-86), 71% (n = 61/86) women] underwent nonunion ORIF (plate and screws) at a mean of 7 months postinjury (range 3-21.5). Eleven (13%) underwent supplementary BG.
Main Outcome Measurements: Union rate and complications for 83 patients (97%) at a mean of 10 months (3-61). Patient-reported outcomes (QuickDASH, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, SF-12, satisfaction) for 53 living, cognitively-intact patients (78%) at a mean of 4.9 years (0.3-9.2).
Results: Ninety-three percent (n = 77/83) achieved union after nonunion ORIF. Complications included recalcitrant nonunion (7%, n = 6/83), iatrogenic radial nerve palsy (6%, n = 5/83), infection (superficial 7%, n = 6/83; deep 2%, n = 2/83), and iliac crest donor site morbidity (38%, n = 3/8). The union rate with BG was 78% (n = 7/9) and without was 95% (n = 70/74; P = 0.125), and was not associated with the nonunion type (atrophic 91%, n = 53/58; hypertrophic 96%, n = 24/25; P = 0.663). Median QuickDASH was 22.7 (0-95), EQ-5D 0.710 (-0.181-1), EQ-visual analog scale 80 (10-100), SF-12 physical component summary 41.9 (16-60.5), and mental component summary 52.6 (18.7-67.7). Nineteen percent (n = 10/53) were dissatisfied with their outcome.
Conclusions: ORIF for humeral diaphyseal nonunion was associated with a high rate of union. Routine BG was not required and avoided the risk of donor site morbidity. One in 5 patients were dissatisfied despite the majority achieving union.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest.
(Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)