Back to Search Start Over

Excavated vs novel in situ soil washing as a remediation strategy for sandy soils impacted with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances from aqueous film forming foams.

Authors :
Høisæter Å
Arp HPH
Slinde G
Knutsen H
Hale SE
Breedveld GD
Hansen MC
Source :
The Science of the total environment [Sci Total Environ] 2021 Nov 10; Vol. 794, pp. 148763. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Jul 01.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

In situ soil washing at the field scale has not yet been investigated as a remediation strategy for soils impacted by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). This remediation strategy is a promising low-cost alternative to other costlier remediation options like excavating, transporting and landfilling large amounts of PFAS contaminated soil. However, it is unclear if it is effective at the field scale, where large areas of heterogenous soil can be challenging to saturate with infiltration water and then pump to a treatment facility. To address this for the first time, herein we established three different trials involving in situ washing of an undisturbed, 3 m deep, sandy vadose zone soil contaminated with aqueous film forming foam (AFFF). The trials were performed at a site with an established pump and treat system for treating PFAS contaminated groundwater. In situ soil washing was compared to the more conventional practice of washing excavated soil on top of an impermeable bottom lining where the PFAS contaminated water was collected and monitored in a drainage system before treatment. The measured amount of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) removed was compared with expectations based on a non-calibrated, 1-D first order rate saturated soil model using only the local soil-to-water distribution coefficient as well as the volume and irrigation rate of wash water as input. This model predicted results within a factor of 2. The suspected reasons for small discrepancies between model predictions and excavated vs in situ washing was a combination of the heterogeneity of PFOS distribution in the soil as well as preferential flow paths during soil washing that prevented full saturation. This analysis showed that in situ soil washing was more efficient and less costly than washing excavated sandy soil, particularly if a pump-and-treat system is already in place.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-1026
Volume :
794
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Science of the total environment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34323778
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148763