Back to Search Start Over

Low temperature structures and magnetic interactions in the organic-based ferromagnetic and metamagnetic polymorphs of decamethylferrocenium 7,7,8,8-tetracyano-p-quinodimethanide, [FeCp* 2 ]˙ + [TCNQ]˙ .

Authors :
Lapidus SH
Stephens PW
Fumanal M
Ribas-Ariño J
Novoa JJ
DaSilva JG
Rheingold AL
Miller JS
Source :
Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003) [Dalton Trans] 2021 Aug 28; Vol. 50 (32), pp. 11228-11242. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Aug 02.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

To identify the genesis of the differing magnetic behaviors for the ferro- (FO) and metamagnetic (MM) polymorphs of [FeCp* <subscript>2</subscript> ][TCNQ] (Cp* = pentamethylcyclopentadienide; TCNQ = 7,7,8,8-tetracyano-p-quinodimethane) the low temperature (18 ± 1 K) structures of each polymorph were determined from high-resolution synchrotron powder diffraction data. Each polymorph possesses chains of alternating S = 1/2 [FeCp* <subscript>2</subscript> ]˙ <superscript>+</superscript> cations and S = 1/2 [TCNQ]˙ <superscript>+</superscript> , but with differing relative orientations. These as well as an additional paramagnetic polymorph do not thermally interconvert. In addition, the room and low (<70 ± 10 K) temperature structures of the MM polymorph, MM <subscript>RT</subscript> and MM <subscript>LT</subscript> , respectively, differ from that previously reported at 167 K (-106 °C) MM structure, and no evidence of either phase transition was previously noted even from the magnetic data. This transition temperature and enthalpy of this phase transition for MM <subscript>RT</subscript> ⇌MM was determined to be 226.5 ± 0.4 K (-46.7 ± 0.4 °C) and 0.68 ± 0.04 kJ mol <superscript>-1</superscript> upon warming, respectively, from differential calorimetry studies (DSC). All three MM phases are triclinic (P1[combining macron]) with the room temperature phase having a doubled unit cell relative to the other two. The lower temperature phase transition involves a small rearrangement of the molecular ions and shift in lattice parameters. These three MM and FO polymorphs have been characterized and form extended 1-D chains with alternating S = 1/2 [FeCp* <subscript>2</subscript> ]˙ <superscript>+</superscript> cations, and S = 1/2 [TCNQ]˙ <superscript>-</superscript> anions, whereas the fifth, paramagnetic (P) polymorph possesses S = 0 π-[TCNQ] <subscript>2</subscript> <superscript>2-</superscript> dimers. At 18 ± 1 K the intrachain FeFe separations are 10.738(2) and 10.439(3) Å for the FO and MM <subscript>LT</subscript> polymorphs, respectively. The key structural differences between FO and MM <subscript>LT</subscript> at 18 ± 1 K are the 10% shorter interchain NN and the 2.8% shorter intrachain FeFe separation present for MM <subscript>LT</subscript> . Computational analysis of all nearest-neighbor spin couplings for the 18 K structures of FO and MM <subscript>LT</subscript> indicates that the intrachain [FeCp* <subscript>2</subscript> ]˙ <superscript>+</superscript> [TCNQ]˙ <superscript>-</superscript> spin couplings (H = -2S <subscript>i</subscript> ·S <subscript>j</subscript> ) are the strongest (4.95 and 6.5 cm <superscript>-1</superscript> for FO and MM <subscript>LT</subscript> , respectively), as previously hypothesized, and are ferromagnetic due to their S = 1/2 spins residing in orthogonal orbitals. The change in relative [TCNQ]˙ <superscript>-</superscript> [TCNQ]˙ <superscript>-</superscript> orientations leads to a computed change from the ferromagnetic interaction (0.2 cm <superscript>-1</superscript> ) for FO to an antiferromagnetic interaction (-0.1 cm <superscript>-1</superscript> ) for MM <subscript>LT</subscript> in accord with its observed antiferromagnetic ground state. Hence, the magnetic ground state cannot be solely described by the dominant magnetic interactions.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1477-9234
Volume :
50
Issue :
32
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34338700
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1039/d1dt02106k