Back to Search Start Over

Clinical outcomes in patients with retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A meta-analysis.

Authors :
Karasuyama M
Gotoh M
Kawakami J
Harada N
Nakamura H
Ohzono H
Shiba N
Source :
Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association [J Orthop Sci] 2022 Sep; Vol. 27 (5), pp. 1017-1024. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Aug 13.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Rotator cuff retear is a major concern after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR); however, the effects of retear remain unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of postoperative retear and intact tendons after ARCR.<br />Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and PEDro databases for studies performed from January 2000 to June 2020. Clinical outcomes included the Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California Los Angeles shoulder (UCLA) score, pain score, range of motion, and muscle strength. Meta-analysis using random-effects models was performed on the pooled results to determine significance.<br />Results: The initial database search yielded 3141 records. After removal of duplicates, 26 of which met the inclusion criteria. Patients in the retear group had significantly lower Constant score [- 8.51 points (95% CI, - 10.29 to - 6.73); P < 0.001], ASES score [- 12.53 points (95% CI, - 16.27 to - 8.79); P < 0.001], UCLA score [- 3.77 points (95% CI, - 4.72 to - 2.82); P < 0.001], and significantly higher pain score [0.56 cm (95% CI, 0.10 to 1.01); P = 0.02] than the intact group. In addition, the retear group had significantly lower flexion [- 10.46° (95% CI, - 19.86 to - 1.07); P = 0.03], abduction [- 14.84° (95% CI, - 28.55 to - 1.14); P = 0.03], and external rotation [- 7.22° (95% CI, - 13.71 to - 0.74); P = 0.03] range of motion, and flexion [- 1.65 kg·f (95% CI, - 2.29 to - 1.01); P < 0.001], abduction [- 1.87 kg·f (95% CI, - 3.02 to - 0.72); P = 0.001], and external rotation [- 1.66 kg·f (95% CI, - 3.25 to - 0.07); P = 0.04] muscle strength.<br />Conclusion: Our results suggest that retear after ARCR leads to poor clinical outcomes after surgery.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1436-2023
Volume :
27
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34400060
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2021.07.009