Back to Search Start Over

Bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, open-label phase 2 study (CLEAR).

Authors :
Udagawa H
Sugiyama E
Harada T
Atagi S
Koyama R
Watanabe S
Nakamura Y
Harada D
Hataji O
Tanaka F
Kida H
Satouchi M
Maeno K
Inoue A
Yoh K
Yamane Y
Urata Y
Yoshioka H
Yamanaka T
Goto K
Source :
Translational lung cancer research [Transl Lung Cancer Res] 2021 Jul; Vol. 10 (7), pp. 3059-3070.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy is a standard treatment for advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC). We aimed to determine the most effective platinum-based combination, such that future studies with atezolizumab can be conducted to further improve patient outcomes.<br />Methods: This phase 2 study enrolled treatment-naïve patients with advanced or recurrent nsNSCLC who were randomly assigned to either cisplatin (75 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> ) + pemetrexed (500 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> ) + bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) (CisPemBev) followed by maintenance PemBev (N=132) or carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 6 mg/mL/min) + paclitaxel (200 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> ) + bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) (CarPacBev) followed by maintenance Bev (N=67). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS, by central review). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR). Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated for safety. This study was designed with the point estimate of the hazard ratio (HR) for PFS calculated based on an expected HR <0.830 with a probability ≥80%.<br />Results: The HR for PFS (CisPemBev/CarPacBev) was 0.825 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.600-1.134, median PFS, 7.6 vs . 7.0 months]. Because the observed point estimate of the HR for PFS was <0.830, the primary endpoint was met, and CisPem doublet therapy was deemed to be more effective than CarPac in terms of PFS. Median OS was 23.4 months for CisPemBev and 21.6 months for CarPacBev (HR 0.845; 95% CI, 0.583-1.242). The ORR was 57% for CisPemBev and 55% for CarPacBev. Both CisPemBev and CarPacBev were well tolerated; grade ≥3 AEs were reported in 67% and 82% of patients, respectively.<br />Conclusions: CisPem combined with Bev was more effective in improving PFS compared with CarPacBev in patients with advanced nsNSCLC. CisPemBev was also well tolerated by this patient population. A study to evaluate the efficacy of atezolizumab plus CisPemBev is warranted.<br />Trial Registration: University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (ID: UMIN000013354).<br />Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-21-240). SW, FT, MS, HY, TY and KG have received honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. SA and KG have received research funds from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. FT, MS and TY have received scholarship endowments from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.<br /> (2021 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2218-6751
Volume :
10
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Translational lung cancer research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34430347
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-21-240