Back to Search Start Over

Systematic, early rhythm control strategy for atrial fibrillation in patients with or without symptoms: the EAST-AFNET 4 trial.

Authors :
Willems S
Borof K
Brandes A
Breithardt G
Camm AJ
Crijns HJGM
Eckardt L
Gessler N
Goette A
Haegeli LM
Heidbuchel H
Kautzner J
Ng GA
Schnabel RB
Suling A
Szumowski L
Themistoclakis S
Vardas P
van Gelder IC
Wegscheider K
Kirchhof P
Source :
European heart journal [Eur Heart J] 2022 Mar 21; Vol. 43 (12), pp. 1219-1230.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Aims: Clinical practice guidelines restrict rhythm control therapy to patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). The EAST-AFNET 4 trial demonstrated that early, systematic rhythm control improves clinical outcomes compared to symptom-directed rhythm control.<br />Methods and Results: This prespecified EAST-AFNET 4 analysis compared the effect of early rhythm control therapy in asymptomatic patients (EHRA score I) to symptomatic patients. Primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, stroke, or hospitalization with worsening of heart failure or acute coronary syndrome, analyzed in a time-to-event analysis. At baseline, 801/2633 (30.4%) patients were asymptomatic [mean age 71.3 years, 37.5% women, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 3.4, 169/801 (21.1%) heart failure]. Asymptomatic patients randomized to early rhythm control (395/801) received similar rhythm control therapies compared to symptomatic patients [e.g. AF ablation at 24 months: 75/395 (19.0%) in asymptomatic; 176/910 (19.3%) symptomatic patients, P = 0.672]. Anticoagulation and treatment of concomitant cardiovascular conditions was not different between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The primary outcome occurred in 79/395 asymptomatic patients randomized to early rhythm control and in 97/406 patients randomized to usual care (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval [0.6; 1.03]), almost identical to symptomatic patients. At 24 months follow-up, change in symptom status was not different between randomized groups (P = 0.19).<br />Conclusion: The clinical benefit of early, systematic rhythm control was not different between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients in EAST-AFNET 4. These results call for a shared decision discussing the benefits of rhythm control therapy in all patients with recently diagnosed AF and concomitant cardiovascular conditions (EAST-AFNET 4; ISRCTN04708680; NCT01288352; EudraCT2010-021258-20).<br /> (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1522-9645
Volume :
43
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European heart journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34447995
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab593