Computed Tomography vs Heavily T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Myelography for the Initial Evaluation of Patients With Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension.

MLA

Tay, Angelique Sao-Mai Sy, et al. “Computed Tomography vs Heavily T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Myelography for the Initial Evaluation of Patients With Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension.” JAMA Neurology, vol. 78, no. 10, Oct. 2021, pp. 1275–76. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2868.

APA

Tay, A. S.-M. S., Maya, M., Moser, F. G., Nuño, M., & Schievink, W. I. (2021). Computed Tomography vs Heavily T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Myelography for the Initial Evaluation of Patients With Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension. JAMA Neurology, 78(10), 1275–1276. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2868

Chicago

Tay, Angelique Sao-Mai Sy, Marcel Maya, Franklin G Moser, Miriam Nuño, and Wouter I Schievink. 2021. “Computed Tomography vs Heavily T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Myelography for the Initial Evaluation of Patients With Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension.” JAMA Neurology 78 (10): 1275–76. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2868.