Back to Search
Start Over
The novel bronchodilator navafenterol: a phase 2a, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in COPD.
- Source :
-
The European respiratory journal [Eur Respir J] 2022 Apr 07; Vol. 59 (4). Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Apr 07 (Print Publication: 2022). - Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- Background: Navafenterol (AZD8871) belongs to a new class of bronchodilator, the single-molecule muscarinic antagonist and β-agonist, developed for the treatment of COPD. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of navafenterol versus placebo and an active comparator treatment for moderate-to-severe COPD.<br />Methods: This phase 2a, randomised, multicentre (Germany and UK), double-blind, double-dummy, three-way complete crossover study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03645434) compared 2 weeks' treatment of once-daily navafenterol 600 µg via inhalation with placebo and a fixed-dose combination bronchodilator (umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI); 62.5 µg/25 µg) in participants with moderate-to-severe COPD. The primary outcome was change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV <subscript>1</subscript> ) on day 15. Secondary end-points included change from baseline in peak FEV <subscript>1</subscript> ; change from baseline in Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale (BCSS); change from baseline in COPD Assessment Tool (CAT); adverse events; and pharmacokinetics.<br />Results: 73 participants were randomised. After 14 days, trough FEV <subscript>1</subscript> was significantly improved with navafenterol compared with placebo (least-squares (LS) mean difference 0.202 L; p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in FEV <subscript>1</subscript> between navafenterol and UMEC/VI (LS mean difference -0.046 L; p=0.075). COPD symptoms (CAT and BCSS) showed significantly greater improvements with both active treatments versus placebo (all p<0.005). Novel objective monitoring (VitaloJAK) showed that cough was reduced with both active treatments compared with placebo. Safety profiles were similar across the treatment groups and no serious adverse events were reported in the navafenterol treatment period.<br />Conclusion: Once-daily navafenterol was well tolerated, improved lung function and reduced COPD-related symptoms, similar to an established once-daily fixed-dose combination bronchodilator.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: D. Singh has received grants and personal fees from Aerogen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Epiendo, GlaxoSmithKline, Glenmark, Gossamerbio, Kinaset, Menarini, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Pulmatrix, Sanofi, Teva, Theravance and Verona, and personal fees from Cipla, Genentech and Peptinnovate. J. Beier has received consultation fees from AstraZeneca, Berlin Chemie/Menarini, Chiesi and Pohl-Boskamp, and participated in scientific advisory boards that were funded by AstraZeneca and Chiesi. C. Astbury, M.G. Belvisi, C.A. Da Silva, A. Jauhiainen, E. Jimenez, A. Lei, S. Necander, U. Wählby Hamrén, W. Xin and I. Psallidas are employees of AstraZeneca and may hold stock or stock options. The VitaloJAK algorithm has been licensed by Manchester University Foundation Trust (MFT) and the University of Manchester to Vitalograph Ltd and Vitalograph Ireland (Ltd); MFT receives royalties which may be shared with the clinical division in which J.A. Smith works, and J.A. Smith has received personal fees from AstraZeneca.<br /> (Copyright ©The authors 2022.)
- Subjects :
- Administration, Inhalation
Bronchodilator Agents therapeutic use
Chlorobenzenes
Cough chemically induced
Cough drug therapy
Cross-Over Studies
Double-Blind Method
Forced Expiratory Volume
Humans
Muscarinic Antagonists
Treatment Outcome
Asthma drug therapy
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1399-3003
- Volume :
- 59
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The European respiratory journal
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 34503985
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00972-2021