Back to Search Start Over

Benefit of Deep Inspiratory Breath Hold for Right Breast Cancer When Regional Lymph Nodes Are Irradiated.

Authors :
Peters GW
Gao SJ
Knowlton C
Zhang A
Evans SB
Higgins S
Wilson LD
Saltmarsh N
Picone M
Moran MS
Source :
Practical radiation oncology [Pract Radiat Oncol] 2022 Jan-Feb; Vol. 12 (1), pp. e7-e12. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Sep 08.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Although deep inspiratory breath-hold (DIBH) is routinely used for left-sided breast cancers, its benefits for right-sided breast cancer (rBC) have yet to be established. We compared free-breathing (FB) and DIBH treatment plans for a cohort of rBC undergoing regional nodal irradiation (RNI) to determine its potential benefits.<br />Methods and Materials: rBC patients considered for RNI (internal mammary nodal chains, supraclavicular field, with or without axilla) from October 2017 to May 2020 were included in this analysis. For each patient, FB versus DIBH plans were generated and dose volume histograms evaluated the following parameters: mean lung dose, ipsilateral lung V <subscript>20</subscript> /V <subscript>5</subscript> (volumes of lung receiving 20 Gy and 5 Gy, respectively); mean heart dose and heart V <subscript>5</subscript> (volumes of heart receiving 5 Gy); liver V <subscript>20 absolute</subscript> /V <subscript>30 absolute</subscript> (absolute volume of liver receiving 20 Gy and 30 Gy, respectively), liver D <subscript>max</subscript> , and total liver volume irradiated (TVI <subscript>liver</subscript> ). The dosimetric parameters were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank testing.<br />Results: Fifty-four patients were eligible for analysis, comparing 108 FB and DIBH plans. DIBH significantly decreased all lung and liver parameters: mean lung dose (19.7 Gy-16.2 Gy, P < .001), lung V <subscript>20</subscript> (40.7%-31.7%, P < .001), lung V <subscript>5</subscript> (61.2%-54.5%, P < .001), TVI <subscript>liver</subscript> (1446 cc vs 1264 cc; P = .006) liver D <subscript>max</subscript> (50.2 Gy vs 48.9 Gy; P = .023), liver V <subscript>20</subscript> (78.8-23.9 cc, P < .001), and liver V <subscript>30</subscript> (58.1-14.6 cc, P < .001) compared with FB. DIBH use did not significantly improve heart parameters, although the V <subscript>5Heart</subscript> trended on significance (1.25-0.6, P = .067).<br />Conclusions: This is the largest cohort to date analyzing DIBH for RNI-rBC. Our findings demonstrate significant improvement in all lung and liver parameters with DIBH, supporting its routine consideration for rBC patients undergoing comprehensive RNI.<br /> (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-8519
Volume :
12
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Practical radiation oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34508890
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2021.08.010